Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40393730›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

Dissociating Frontal Lobe Lesion Induced Deficits in Rule Value Learning Using Reinforcement Learning Models and a WCST Analog.

Lucie Capkova, Matthew Ainsworth, Farshad A Mansouri, Mark J Buckley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucie CapkovaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, United Kingdom lucie.capkova@queens.ox.ac.uk matthew.ainsworth@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Matthew AinsworthDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, United Kingdom lucie.capkova@queens.ox.ac.uk matthew.ainsworth@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5767-7704
Farshad A MansouriCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9130-1789
Mark J BuckleyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-8486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinct frontal regions make dissociable contributions to rule-guided decision-making, including the ability to learn and exploit associations between abstract rules and reward value, maintain those rules in memory, and evaluate choice outcomes. Value-based learning can be quantified using reinforcement learning (RL) models predicting optimal trial-wise choices and estimating learning rates, which can then be related to the intact functioning of specific brain areas by combining a modeling approach with lesion-behavioral data. We applied a three-parameter feedback-dependent RL model to behavioral data obtained from macaques with circumscribed lesions to the principal sulcus (PS), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), superior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (sdlPFC), and frontopolar cortex (FPC) performing a Wisconsin card sorting task (WCST) analog. Our modeling-based approach identified distinct lesion effects on component cognitive mechanisms contributing to WCST performance. OFC lesions decreased the rate of rule value updating following both positive and negative feedback. In contrast, we found no deficit in rule value updating following PS lesions, which instead made monkeys less likely to repeat correct choices when rule values were well established, suggesting a crucial role of the PS in the working memory maintenance of rule representations. Finally, ACC lesions produced a specific deficit in learning from negative feedback, as well as impaired the ability to repeat choices following highly surprising reward, supporting a proposed role for ACC in flexibly switching between a trial-and-error mode and a working memory mode in response to increased error likelihood.

Indexed as

Frontal LobeModels, NeurologicalReinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingMacaca mulattaMaleNeuropsychological TestsRewardcingulate cortexdecision-makingprefrontal cortexreinforcement learningWCST

Identifiers

PMID40393730
PMCPMC12184873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.