Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40393476›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2025

Retrospective Identification and Characterization of Traumatic Brain Injury-Recommendations from the 2024 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Retrospective Classification Working Group.

John D Corrigan, Michael L Alosco, Joukje van der Naalt, Rachel Sayko Adams, Breton M Asken, Sidney Hinds, Anthony H Lequerica, Virginia Newcombe, Olli Tenovuo, Eve Valera and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Research progress on biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

John D CorriganDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Michael L AloscoDepartment of Neurology, Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joukje van der NaaltUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Rachel Sayko AdamsDepartment of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4450-0712
Breton M AskenDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Sidney HindsDepartment of Radiology/Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Anthony H LequericaKessler Foundation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Virginia NewcombeDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6044-9035
Olli TenovuoUniversity of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Eve ValeraHarvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Deborah Yurgelun-ToddMIRECC George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Adele DoperalskiDivision of Neuroscience, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Hibah O AwwadDivision of Neuroscience, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kristen Dams-O'ConnorDepartment of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew I R MaasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Michael A McCreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Nsini UmohDivision of Neuroscience, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Geoffrey T ManleyNeurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Impact of intimate partner violence-related mild traumatic brain injuries on neural, cognitive, and psychological health of womenR01NS112694 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VALERA, EVE M · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) convened experts in traumatic brain injury (TBI) research, policy, clinical practice and people with lived experience to propose a system of injury classification less susceptible to misinterpretation and misrepresentation inherent in the current use of "mild", "moderate" and "severe". One of six working groups addressed Retrospective Classification of TBI. The Working Group consisted of 14 experts in brain injury research representing a breadth of professional disciplines. Initial conclusions based on expert opinion were vetted and revised based on public input at the January 2024 NINDS TBI Classification and Nomenclature Workshop. The Working Group examined five types of methodologies for identifying past TBIs (self/proxy-report, medical record extraction, imaging, fluid-based biomarkers, and performance-based tests). They concluded that self/proxy-report is essential for clinical, research and surveillance applications and that clinicians and researchers should employ elicitation protocols that have been studied and found valid. Medical record extraction was also identified as an invaluable tool for identification of past history of medically attended TBIs; however, there is a need to standardize the case definition employed and procedures used. The use of imaging methods, fluid-based biomarkers, and performance-based assessments in isolation lacked sufficient evidence of both sensitivity and specificity in detecting past histories of TBI to be recommended for this use at this time. The Working Group also evaluated identification of repetitive head impacts (RHI), finding no evidence of a common definition of RHI, a requisite initial step for the development and validation of standardized instruments.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticTerminology as TopicHumansNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U.S.)Retrospective StudiesUnited StatesCBI-M modelcharacterizationclassificationframeworkmedical record extractionNIHNINDSnomenclatureproxy-reportrepetitive head impactself-reporttraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40393476
PMCPMC12409120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.