ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Lumbar Puncture Knowledge and Attitudes among Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Workers in Rural Zambia.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lumbar Puncture in Saudi Arabia: Evaluating Knowledge, Attitude and Sociodemographic Influences.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lumbar puncture (LP) is a safe, standard procedure essential in the investigation of a variety of neurological disorders. However, in many regions, LP uptake and performance are low, even when it is strongly indicated. We sought to understand patient, caregiver, and healthcare worker perspectives in rural Zambia. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adult patients, caregivers of adult and pediatric patients, nurses, doctors, and clinical officers at two rural hospitals in the Southern Province of Zambia. The survey consisted of questions on self-reported LP knowledge, an LP knowledge questionnaire, and open-ended questions about LP perceptions and, for healthcare workers, the LP consent process. Descriptive statistics are reported for quantitative questions, and qualitative responses were thematically coded using an inductive approach. Of 120 total participants, the majority (n = 97; 81%) reported they had previously heard of LPs and indicated having "a little" knowledge (n = 71; 59%), with the most common source of knowledge being friends and family members. Scores on LP knowledge questionnaire were low for patients and caregivers (median three out of seven possible points). Healthcare worker knowledge scores were higher than laypersons (mean = 6) but misperceptions about LPs were still common, with half of healthcare workers reporting LPs cause paralysis. This rural cohort essentially demonstrated the same knowledge gaps and misperceptions previously identified in an urban Zambian cohort, further supporting the need for interventions aimed at the community and healthcare workers regardless of urbanicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.