ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2025
Patterns of presentation, treatment, and survival among older adults with metastatic breast cancer: Results from a large prospective registry.
Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with metastatic breast cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOlder adults with breast cancer experience worse survival than their younger counterparts. However, data are limited on the patterns of presentation, treatment, and outcomes for older patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) outside of registry studies and selected clinical trial populations. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe identified patients aged ≥60 years from a single, NCI-designated cancer center with MBC diagnosed between 1999 and 2022. Using Chi-square testing, we compared clinicopathologic characteristics by age. We also examined treatment patterns and reasons for treatment discontinuation; overall survival (OS) was examined by subtype and age using Kaplan-Meier methods.
resultsThe final analytic cohort included 1115 patients with a median follow-up of 2.9 years (1.0-18.5); median age at metastatic diagnosis was 66.3 (60.0-95.4). Disease subtypes included: 70.7 % hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), 11.9 % any HR/HER2+, 17.4 % triple negative (TN). In those with HR+/HER2- disease receiving first-line (1 L) therapy (n = 783), 1 L endocrine-based therapy was frequent (79.3 % for ages 60-65, 94.7 % for >80), and administration of 1 L chemotherapy varied by age (21.0 % in ages 60-65, 5.3 % in >80). Among those with TN and HER2+ disease, ≥84 % received a 1 L chemotherapy or trastuzumab-containing regimen. Across subtypes, most patients (80.5 %) discontinued 1 L therapy for progression, not toxicity. Among patients ages 60-65, 16.5 % stopped treatment after 1 L therapy; 42.2 % of those >age 80 received treatment after 1 L. Clinical trial enrollment declined with age (40 % in 60-65 vs. 13 % for >80; p = 0.0004), as did median OS (4.4 years in ages 60-65 vs. 2.7 years for >80; p < 0.005). For ages 60-65, 37.8 %, 17.1 %, and 40.3 % with HR + HER2-, TN, and HER2+ disease, respectively, were alive at two years. For ages >80, 23.7 %, 0 %, and 33.3 % with HR + HER2-, TN, and HER2+ disease, respectively, were alive at two years. DISCUSSION: In a unique, large prospective cohort of older adults with MBC, the number of treatment lines decreased with increasing age, and OS outcomes were poor, particularly for those >80 years where most patients were not alive at two years after MBC diagnosis. Therapeutic approaches, with improved supportive care, are urgently needed to optimize outcomes in the oldest patients with MBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.