Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40393031›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Rewarding animals based on their subjective percepts is enabled by online Bayesian estimation of perceptual biases.

Yelin Dong, Gabor Lengyel, Sabyasachi Shivkumar, Akiyuki Anzai, Grace F DiRisio, Ralf M Haefner, Gregory C DeAngelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yelin DongDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences & Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, New York, United States of America.
Gabor LengyelDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences & Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-3250
Sabyasachi ShivkumarDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences & Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, New York, United States of America.
Akiyuki AnzaiDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences & Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, New York, United States of America.
Grace F DiRisioDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences & Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ralf M HaefnerDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences & Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, New York, United States of America.
Gregory C DeAngelisDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences & Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Susana Marcos · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
Project C: Neural basis of causal inference in continuous navigationU19NS118246 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DRUGOWITSCH, JAN · 2020 to 2024
$12.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS118246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the neural basis of perceptual biases, such as those produced by visual illusions, can provide powerful insights into the neural mechanisms of perceptual inference. However, studying the subjective percepts of animals poses a fundamental challenge: unlike human participants, animals cannot be verbally instructed to report what they see, hear, or feel. Instead, they must be trained to perform a task for reward, and researchers must infer from their responses what the animal perceived. However, animals' responses are shaped by reward feedback, thus raising the major concern that the reward regimen may alter the animal's decision strategy or even their intrinsic perceptual biases. Using simulations of a reinforcement learning agent, we demonstrate that conventional reward strategies fail to allow accurate estimation of perceptual biases. We developed a method that estimates perceptual bias during task performance and then computes the reward for each trial based on the evolving estimate of the animal's perceptual bias. Our approach makes use of multiple stimulus contexts to dissociate perceptual biases from decision-related biases. Starting with an informative prior, our Bayesian method updates a posterior over the perceptual bias after each trial. The prior can be specified based on data from past sessions, thus reducing the variability of the online estimate and allowing it to converge to a stable value over a small number of trials. After validating our method on synthetic data, we apply it to estimate perceptual biases of monkeys in a motion direction discrimination task in which varying background optic flow induces robust perceptual biases. This method overcomes an important challenge to understanding the neural basis of subjective percepts.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDecision MakingMacaca mulattaReinforcement, PsychologyVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID40393031
PMCPMC12129325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.