Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhancing ERα-targeted compound efficacy in breast cancer threapy with ExplainableAI and GeneticAlgorithm.

Zeonlung Pun, Qiaoyun Xue, Yichi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeonlung PunDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1430-2130
Qiaoyun XueDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G128QQ, United Kingdom.
Yichi ZhangFaculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a major cause of mortality among women globally, driving the need for advanced therapeutic solutions. This study presents a novel, comprehensive methodology integrating explainable artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning models, and genetic algorithms to enhance the bioactivity and ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) properties of compounds targeting estrogen receptor alpha (ER[Formula: see text]). By employing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LassoNet, we identified and refined 50 critical molecular descriptors from an initial set of 729, significantly influencing the prediction of bioactivity. The selected descriptors were systematically validated, bolstering the predictive robustness of our models, which demonstrated a mean coefficient of determination of 77[Formula: see text] for bioactivity and high accuracy scores of 90.2[Formula: see text], 93.7[Formula: see text], 89.5[Formula: see text], 87.3[Formula: see text], and 95.8[Formula: see text] for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity, respectively. Further optimization through genetic algorithms identified candidate compounds with superior bioactivity, achieving pIC50 values as high as 10.05, surpassing the previously observed peak values in the dataset. These results underscore the potential of leveraging advanced machine learning and optimization techniques to accelerate the discovery of effective cancer therapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMachine LearningAntineoplastic AgentsESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID40392928
PMCPMC12091784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.