Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392923›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Unequal gains from remote work during COVID-19 between spouses: Evidence from longitudinal data in Singapore.

Zeewan Lee, Poh Lin Tan, Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeewan LeeLee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-6582
Poh Lin TanInstitute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jie-Sheng Tan-SooLee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak and the rise of remote work may have generated distinct labor market outcomes for workers, depending on their occupation and adaptability to changes in the mode of work. Using panel data of married spouses around the time of the government-mandated lockdown in Singapore and difference-in-differences models, we examine the effects of remote work arrangements on salary income, work hours, and wages. We find that the benefits of remote work during the pandemic were not distributed evenly across male and female spouses-translating into longer and significant gains in salary income only for male workers who adopted full remote work arrangements. In contrast, female remote workers' income gains were limited by disproportionately heavier household responsibilities (i.e., chores), which in turn led to constrained work hours.

Indexed as

COVID-19SpousesTeleworkingAdultEmploymentFemaleHumansIncomeLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSalaries and Fringe BenefitsSARS-CoV-2Singapore

Identifiers

PMID40392923
PMCPMC12091887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.