ArticlePloS one2025
Mitigating CO2 emissions associated with digital economy sectors through whole supply chain management.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As China's digital economy sectors rapidly expand, the growing demand for coal-based electricity has become a significant source of CO2 emissions. However, the mechanism driving these emissions within supply chains remain unclear, hindering targeted carbon management. This study addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of CO2 emissions thorough the whole supply chain perspective, covering income-, production-, betweenness-, and consumption-based perspectives, along with upstream and downstream supply chain paths. It employs Leontief and Ghosh input-output (IO) frameworks and structural path analysis. The results indicate: (1) The core industry sector of the digital economy (CIDE) ranks highest in CO2 emissions from consumption-based perspective, while the industrial digitalization sector (IDS) ranks highest from both consumption- and betweenness-based perspectives. (2) Inter provincial flows are the main source driving the digital economy sectors' supply chain embodied CO2 emissions from consumption-based perspective, while labor compensation is the primary source driving its enabled CO2 emissions from income-based perspective. (3) High-carbon upstream and downstream supply chain paths driven by the digital economy sectors are short, with the power and heat production and supply sector and IDS playing crucial roles within these chains. Based on these findings, policy recommendations are provided to optimize supply chain structures, promote green consumption, and integrate carbon management into sector-specific strategies to reduce emissions across both upstream and downstream paths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.