Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392898›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation.

Tianhao Zhu, Kexin Xu, Wonchan Son, Kristofer Linton-Reid, Marc Boubnovski-Martell, Matt Grech-Sollars, Antoine D Lain, Joram M Posma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianhao ZhuSection of Bioinformatics, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kexin XuSection of Bioinformatics, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7373-7367
Wonchan SonSection of Bioinformatics, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kristofer Linton-ReidDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marc Boubnovski-MartellDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matt Grech-SollarsDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3881-4870
Antoine D LainSection of Bioinformatics, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joram M PosmaSection of Bioinformatics, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4971-9003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest X-ray (CXR) is a diagnostic tool for cardiothoracic assessment. They make up 50% of all diagnostic imaging tests. With hundreds of images examined every day, radiologists can suffer from fatigue. This fatigue may reduce diagnostic accuracy and slow down report generation. We describe a prototype computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) pipeline employing computer vision (CV) and Natural Language Processing (NLP). It was trained and evaluated on the publicly available MIMIC-CXR dataset. We perform image quality assessment, view labelling, and segmentation-based cardiomegaly severity classification. We use the output of the severity classification for large language model-based report generation. Four board-certified radiologists assessed the output accuracy of our CAD pipeline. Across the dataset composed of 377,100 CXR images and 227,827 free-text radiology reports, our system identified 0.18% of cases with mixed-sex mentions, 0.02% of poor quality images (F1 = 0.81), and 0.28% of wrongly labelled views (accuracy 99.4%). We assigned views for 4.18% of images which have unlabelled views. Our binary cardiomegaly classification model has 95.2% accuracy. The inter-radiologist agreement on evaluating the generated report's semantics and correctness for radiologist-MIMIC is 0.62 (strict agreement) and 0.85 (relaxed agreement) similar to the radiologist-CAD agreement of 0.55 (strict) and 0.93 (relaxed). Our work found and corrected several incorrect or missing metadata annotations for the MIMIC-CXR dataset. The performance of our CAD system suggests performance on par with human radiologists. Future improvements revolve around improved text generation and the development of CV tools for other diseases.

Identifiers

PMID40392898
PMCPMC12091825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.