ArticlePloS one2025
From dyadic coping to emotional sharing and multimodal interpersonal synchrony: Protocol for a laboratory experiment.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During interpersonal emotion regulation, relationship partners mutually regulate each other's emotional states. Interpersonal emotion regulation occurs at three main timescales: phasic (from several hundred milliseconds to about 10s), tonic (from 10s to 1 hour), and chronic (from weeks to months and years). Prior research has examined interpersonal emotion regulation at only one or two timescales simultaneously. The proposed research will examine variables relating to interpersonal emotion regulation in close relationships across all three timescales. A total of 150 romantic couples will engage in an emotional sharing task, in which they will be instructed to either engage in natural sharing or co-rumination. At the phasic timescale, primary outcomes will be interpersonal synchrony in movements and cardiovascular responses throughout the sharing task. At the tonic timescale, primary outcomes will be changes in mood and emotional appraisals pre- and post-sharing. At the chronic timescale, the study will primarily assess individual differences in relationship quality and dyadic coping style prior to the task, which are expected to shape phasic and tonic patterns during emotional sharing. Our general expectation is that phasic patterns in interpersonal emotion regulation (e.g., movement synchrony) will be meaningfully related to tonic patterns (e.g., mood change), which, in turn, will be meaningfully related to chronic patterns (e.g., relationship quality). More differentiated hypotheses and exploratory analyses are detailed in the protocol. The results of this research will contribute to the integration of interpersonal emotion regulation theories across different time scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.