Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392881›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Medication errors in community pharmacies: a systematic review of the international literature.

Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Rayah Asiri, Andy Husband, Adam Todd

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maguy Saffouh El HajjClinical Pharmacy and Practice Department, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-4679
Rayah AsiriSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Andy HusbandSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Adam ToddSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince the 1999 report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) 'To Err is Human.', medication safety has become a public health concern due to its impact on preventable harm and healthcare costs. While formal systems in hospitals exist to address medication errors, there is less evidence in community pharmacies. The objective of this systematic review is to synthesise and critically appraise the international evidence about the prevalence, nature, and severity of medication errors in community pharmacies. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic review was conducted for the literature published from January 1995 to December 2023. The choice of this date range was made to include a sufficient breadth of research conducted both preceding and subsequent to the publication of the IOM report. Various databases were used, supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies and grey literature. Studies were selected through a rigorous screening process. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out using structured tools. Narrative and descriptive synthesis was conducted by geographical regions.

results56898 potentially eligible studies were identified, yielding 73 included studies. Most studies were conducted in Europe and Central Asia and North America with few conducted in other regions. Most studies focused on prescribing and dispensing errors, with fewer studies addressing errors in other stages of the medication use process. Variations in error rates and types were observed across regions, which made calculating a global rate of errors challenging. Very few studies assessed the severity of medication errors with the majority of these being conducted in Europe and Central Asia and North America. Risk of bias varied, with selection and identification bias being common in all regions.

conclusionsThis review underscores the need to assess medication safety in regions with limited pharmacy access and advocate for a standardised global reporting framework to streamline data analysis. Additionally, it implies that investigating the types and severity of medication errors is imperative. Addressing these gaps through rigorous quantitative and qualitative research could inform policy-making and implementation of strategies to enhance patient safety in community pharmacies.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsPharmaciesHumans

Identifiers

PMID40392881
PMCPMC12091811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.