Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392877›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Improvement in quality of life and cognitive function in Post-COVID syndrome after online occupational therapy: Results from a randomized controlled pilot study.

Dominik Schröder, Andrea Stölting, Christina Müllenmeister, Georg M N Behrens, Sandra Klawitter, Frank Klawonn, Aisha Cook, Nadja Wegner, Martin Wetzke, Tim Schmachtenberg and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dominik SchröderDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-4725
Andrea StöltingDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7084-9013
Christina MüllenmeisterDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Georg M N BehrensDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sandra KlawitterInstitute of Information Engineering, Ostfalia University of applied sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2741-5989
Frank KlawonnInstitute of Information Engineering, Ostfalia University of applied sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9613-182X
Aisha CookTim-Cook Occupational Therapy, Hannover, Germany.
Nadja WegnerDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-8918-5461
Martin WetzkeDepartment of Pediatric Allergology, Pneumology, and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1462-9569
Tim SchmachtenbergDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Alexandra Dopfer-JablonkaDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-100X
Frank MüllerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9496-9423
Christine HappleGerman Center for Infection Research, RESIST, Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-COVID syndrome (PCS) poses enormous clinical challenges. Occupational therapy (OT) is recommended in PCS, but structural validation of this concept is pending.

methodsIn an unblinded randomized pilot study (clinical trial # DRKS0026007), feasibility and effects of online OT in PCS were tested. Probands received structured online OT over 12 weeks either via interactive online treatment sessions (interactive group) or prerecorded videos (video group). 50% of probands received no online OT (control group). At week 0, 12, and 24, we analyzed study experience, health-related quality of life, cognitive functions. impairment in performance, and social participation.

resultsN = 158 probands (mean age 38 yrs., 86% female) were included into the analyses. The study experience was described as positive or very positive in 83.3% of probands in the interactive versus 48.1% of probands in the video group (p = 0.001). After 12 weeks, all groups displayed significant improvement in concentration, memory, and performance of daily tasks. After 24 weeks, significant improvement in concentration and memory were observed in control- and video-probands, and social participation had improved after video-OT. However, only probands in the interactive online OT group showed improvement of all measured endpoints including concentration, memory, quality of life, and social participation.

conclusionWe show that online OT is feasible, and that interactive online OT is a promising treatment strategy for affected patients. We present exploratory data on its efficacy and describe variables that can be employed for further investigations in confirmatory trials.

Indexed as

CognitionOccupational TherapyPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeQuality of LifeAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID40392877
PMCPMC12091760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.