ArticlePloS one2025
Determining resources and capabilities in complex context: A decision-making model for banks.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of resources and capabilities in shaping and implementing a firm's strategy is paramount. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the necessity for managers to possess a decision-making model that facilitates the selection of resources and capabilities in a real-time, dynamic, adaptive, and iterative manner. However, the dynamic capabilities framework, which serves as a decision-making model, faces three significant issues when selecting resources and capabilities within complex contexts. These issues, identified as research gaps, include context mismatch, inappropriate treatment, and strategy alignment. These gaps serve as the foundation for decision making models. This study aims to develop a decision-making model for determining banking resources and capabilities. The novelty of this study is encapsulated in the proposed decision-making model for resource and capability determination in complex contexts. Furthermore, this study employed a methodology adapted from the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research-Society of Medical Decision Making (ISPOR-SMDM). The research methodology was conducted in ten stages to develop a decision-making model. This study used qualitative methods, a case study strategy, and an abductive approach. The research sample consists of Indonesian State-Owned Banks (SOB). This research culminated in a proposed decision-making model that includes seven managerial decisions: probe, sense, structuring, bundling, building, leverage, and reconfiguring. This model integrates fuzzy preference judgments as inputs, deep learning analytics (predictive analysis) as processes, and success rate predictions as outputs. Theoretically, this research contributes to the enhancement of dynamic capabilities through the complex domains of the cynefin framework. Practically, it offers a decision-making model for the board of directors (BOD) to determine resources and capabilities amid complex environmental changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.