Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392853›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Can AI weather models predict out-of-distribution gray swan tropical cyclones?

Y Qiang Sun, Pedram Hassanzadeh, Mohsen Zand, Ashesh Chattopadhyay, Jonathan Weare, Dorian S Abbot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Reclassifying lethal heat.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Y Qiang SunDepartment of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.ORCID 0000-0001-5190-4681
Pedram HassanzadehDepartment of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Mohsen ZandResearch Computing Center, The Office of the Provost, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Ashesh ChattopadhyayDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064.ORCID 0000-0002-2590-1230
Jonathan WeareCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 10012.ORCID 0000-0001-8745-1821
Dorian S AbbotDepartment of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.

Funding

DOD | USA | AFC | CCDC | Army Research Office (ARO) W911NF-22-2-0124DOD | USN | Office of Naval Research (ONR) N000142012722NSF | GEO | Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (AGS) AGS-2046309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting gray swan weather extremes, which are possible but so rare that they are absent from the training dataset, is a major concern for AI weather models and long-term climate emulators. An important open question is whether AI models can extrapolate from weaker weather events present in the training set to stronger, unseen weather extremes. To test this, we train independent versions of the AI weather model FourCastNet on the 1979-2015 ERA5 dataset with all data, or with Category 3-5 tropical cyclones (TCs) removed, either globally or only over the North Atlantic or Western Pacific basin. We then test these versions of FourCastNet on 2018-2023 Category 5 TCs (gray swans). All versions yield similar accuracy for global weather, but the one trained without Category 3-5 TCs cannot accurately forecast Category 5 TCs, indicating that these models cannot extrapolate from weaker storms. The versions trained without Category 3-5 TCs in one basin show some skill forecasting Category 5 TCs in that basin, suggesting that FourCastNet can generalize across tropical basins. This is encouraging and surprising because regional information is implicitly encoded in inputs. Given that current state-of-the-art AI weather and climate models have similar learning strategies, we expect our findings to apply to other models. Other types of weather extremes need to be similarly investigated. Our work demonstrates that novel learning strategies are needed for AI models to reliably provide early warning or estimated statistics for the rarest, most impactful TCs, and, possibly, other weather extremes.

Indexed as

AI weather modelsgray swan weather extremesout-of-distribution generalization

Identifiers

PMID40392853
PMCPMC12130898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.