Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392839›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Re-evaluating the choice of gamma stimulation frequency for the potential treatment of Alzheimer's disease: Novel invisible spectral flicker evokes gamma responses at various frequencies.

Mark Alexander Henney, Bianca Laura Hansen, Luna Skytte Hansen, Manja Gersholm Grønberg, Martin William Thorning-Schmidt, Henrik Enggaard Hansen, Mai Nguyen, Paul Michael Petersen, Line Katrine Harder Clemmensen, Marcus Carstensen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mark Alexander HenneyTechnical University of Denmark, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4343-1068
Bianca Laura HansenTechnical University of Denmark, Department of Physics, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Luna Skytte HansenOptoCeutics ApS, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5158-1309
Manja Gersholm GrønbergTechnical University of Denmark, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Martin William Thorning-SchmidtOptoCeutics ApS, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Henrik Enggaard HansenOptoCeutics ApS, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Mai NguyenOptoCeutics ApS, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Paul Michael PetersenTechnical University of Denmark, Department of Electrical and Photonics Engineering, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Line Katrine Harder ClemmensenTechnical University of Denmark, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Marcus CarstensenOptoCeutics ApS, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9312-0906
Kristoffer Hougaard MadsenTechnical University of Denmark, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent advances in the potential usage of visual gamma stimulation at 40 Hz for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, there is motivation to evaluate adjacent frequencies to ensure that specifically 40 Hz is optimal. As visual stimulation with luminance flicker may affect adherence in clinical trials due to its inherent perceived flickering, invisible spectral flicker (ISF) was proposed as a more comfortable alternative for entraining 40 Hz. Based on current understanding of the potential mechanism of action for 40 Hz stimulation, the exact frequency is debatable. This study investigates the ability of ISF to evoke acute gamma responses at several frequencies in the range of 36-44 Hz. Twenty healthy volunteers were included in an electroencephalography (EEG) experiment with ISF stimulation at nine different frequencies (36-44 Hz, 1 Hz interval). Estimated signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) showed that the cortical power was significantly increased at all stimulation frequencies compared to baseline, but with no significant difference in SNR between stimulation frequencies. There was a significant subject effect, suggesting that there is higher variability between subjects than between frequencies alone. Our results indicate that ISF can evoke steady-state potentials at several frequencies in the low gamma range of 36-44 Hz. Across the population of participants, no preference or trend for any specific gamma stimulation frequency in the tested range was found. While the subject-stimulus interaction was significant, it described little variance and showed no specific patterns for individual preference of frequency.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseGamma RhythmPhotic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID40392839
PMCPMC12091823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.