Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392792›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2025

Canadian student and presenter perceptions of the appeal, appropriateness, and comprehensiveness of the CATCH My Breath vaping prevention curriculum.

Lucas R W Fairs, Farzana Rahman, Beheshta Momand, Anne Philipneri, Celina Degano, Marcella Bianco, Dale S Mantey, Steven H Kelder, Adam G Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucas R W FairsFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3510-6230
Farzana RahmanFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.
Beheshta MomandFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.
Anne PhilipneriHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, 661 University Avenue, Suite 1701, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.
Celina DeganoHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, 661 University Avenue, Suite 1701, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada.
Marcella BiancoCATCH Global Foundation, PO Box 28282, Austin, TX 78755, United States.
Dale S ManteyMichael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas, 1836 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 510, Austin, TX 78701, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1122-4849
Steven H KelderMichael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas, 1836 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 510, Austin, TX 78701, United States.
Adam G ColeFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-2725

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society 707253Institute of Cancer Research POC-181035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotine vaping is common among Canadian youth. However, there is a lack of evidence for effective school-based prevention approaches targeting nicotine vaping, particularly for high school students. This study explored Canadian student and presenter perceptions of the CATCH My Breath (CMB) curriculum's appeal, appropriateness, and comprehensiveness. A convenience sample of 10 high schools across Ontario, Canada, implemented the CMB curriculum between October 2022 and April 2023. A group of 40 students between 13 and 15 years old participated in six focus groups and 12 curriculum presenters [i.e. teachers and public health unit staff (PHU)] completed interviews to provide feedback about the appeal, appropriateness, and comprehensiveness of the curriculum for Canadian high school students. Qualitative thematic analysis identified major themes from both groups. Presenters and students highlighted key aspects of the curriculum, including the negative health risks of vaping, refusal skills development, and use of engaging activities. Presenters and students offered suggestions for improvement, including extending the session length, using up-to-date relevant statistics, and adding content (e.g. personal testimonies). Presenters and students generally thought that the curriculum was comprehensive, appealing, and appropriate for Canadian high school students. Future studies should evaluate the impacts of the curriculum on student vaping behaviours.

Indexed as

CurriculumStudentsVapingAdolescentCanadaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleOntarioQualitative ResearchSchools

Identifiers

PMID40392792
PMCPMC12090987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.