ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring weighted network backbone extraction: A comparative analysis of structural techniques.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From class effects to specificity FAERS evidence and network mapping of adverse events in NSCLC targeted therapy.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backbone extraction simplifies complex networks while retaining essential features. It reduces complexity without losing critical structural information. However, selecting the most suitable method remains challenging due to the diverse behaviors of existing techniques. This study evaluates eight structural backbone extraction methods designed for weighted networks. These methods leverage network topology rather than statistical weight distributions. A dataset of 33 real-world networks is analyzed, covering diverse sizes, topologies, and domains. Key metrics, such as Jaccard similarity and Overlap Coefficient, reveal distinct method behaviors. A hierarchical relationship emerges among methods. Primary Linkage Analysis (PLAM) captures the most substantial edges, forming the simplest backbone. Minimum Spanning Tree (MSP), Ultrametric Backbone (UMB), and Metric Backbone (MB) build on this structure, progressively adding connectivity and detail. The Doubly Stochastic Filter excels at preserving weight and degree distributions, connectivity, and transitivity. By contrast, the H-Backbone prioritizes high-weight edges but disrupts connectivity. Metric Backbone and Planar Maximally Filtered Graph ensure complete node preservation and maintain high reachability. These insights advance the understanding of structural backbone extraction techniques for weighted networks. They benefit applications in fields like biology, social networks, and transportation. Practitioners can better achieve goals like network simplification for visualization or property preservation for analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.