Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392783›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2025

Statistical Methods for Chemical Mixtures: A Roadmap for Practitioners Using Simulation Studies and a Sample Data Analysis in the PROTECT Cohort.

Wei Hao, Amber L Cathey, Max M Aung, Jonathan Boss, John D Meeker, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond total irradiance: a PCA-based filtering framework identifies wavelength-dependent biological signatures of sunlight exposure.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei HaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5367-1479
Amber L CatheyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Max M AungDivision of Environmental Health, University of South California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jonathan BossDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
John D MeekerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Bhramar MukherjeeYale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Research Experiences and Training Coordination CoreP42ES017198 · NIEHS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS, SEAN M · 2010 to 2024
$38.6M
Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
MI-CARES: The Michigan Cancer and Research on the Environment StudyUH3CA267907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy, Bhramar Mukherjee · 2024 to 2026
$6.0M
Environmental PAH exposure and preeclampsia risk: Investigation of PE subtypes and the role of inflammation and oxidative stress.R01ES031591 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI John D. Meeker · 2021 to 2026
$3.9M
The Study of the Environment and Alzheimer's disease and related Dementias (SEAD)R01AG070897 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BAKULSKI, KELLY, PARK, SUNG KYUN · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
MI-CARES: The Michigan Cancer and Research on the Environment StudyUG3CA267907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DOLINOY, DANA, MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2021 to 2022
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA267907NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA267907NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070897NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES017198NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES031591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative characterization of the health impacts associated with exposure to chemical mixtures has received considerable attention in current environmental and epidemiological studies. With many existing statistical methods and emerging approaches, it is important for practitioners to understand which method is best suited for their inferential goals.

objectiveThe goal of this paper is to provide empirical simulation-based evidence regarding performance of mixture methods to help guide researchers on selecting the best available methods to address three scientific questions in mixtures analysis: identifying important components of a mixture, identifying interactions among mixture components, and creating a summary score for risk stratification and prediction.

methodsWe conducted a review and comparison of 11 analytical methods available for use in mixtures research through extensive simulation studies for continuous and binary outcomes. In addition, we carried out an illustrative data analysis using the PROTECT birth cohort from Puerto Rico to examine the associations between exposure to chemical mixtures-metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalates, and phenols-and birth outcomes.

resultsOur simulation results suggest that the choice of methods depends on the goal of analysis and that there is no clear winner across the board. For selection of important toxicants in the mixtures and for identifying interactions, Elastic net (Enet) by Zou et al., Lasso for Hierarchical Interactions (HierNet) by Bien et al., and selection of nonlinear interactions by a forward stepwise algorithm (SNIF) by Narisetty et al. have the most stable performance across simulation settings. For overall summary or a cumulative measure, we find that using the Super Learner to combine multiple environmental risk scores can lead to improved risk stratification and prediction properties.

conclusionsWe develop an integrated R package "CompMix" that provides a platform for mixtures analysis where the practitioners can implement a pipeline that includes several approaches for mixtures analysis. Our study offers guidelines for selecting appropriate statistical methods for addressing specific scientific questions related to mixtures research. We identify critical gaps where new and better methods are needed. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15305.

Indexed as

Complex MixturesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsCohort StudiesComputer SimulationFemaleHumansPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPuerto RicoComplex MixturesEnvironmental PollutantsPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID40392783
PMCPMC12178341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.