ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2025
Statistical Methods for Chemical Mixtures: A Roadmap for Practitioners Using Simulation Studies and a Sample Data Analysis in the PROTECT Cohort.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond total irradiance: a PCA-based filtering framework identifies wavelength-dependent biological signatures of sunlight exposure.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
- Article
- In utero PFAS exposure, inflammation, and behavioral problems in childhood.Environmental research · 2026Article
- Development of a Biology-Informed Chemical Mixture Index for Oxidative Stress and Mortality in NHANES 2005-2010: A Survey-Weighted Quantile G-Computation Approach.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Comparison of environmental mixture methods for estimating the joint effects of environmental mixtures.Environmental research · 2026Article
- Prenatal phthalate exposure and emotional-behavioral problems in children aged 1.5 to 3 years from the PROTECT birth cohort.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Chemical mixtures and birth weight: comparison of multipollutant models in the Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) study.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026Article
- When are novel methods for analyzing complex chemical mixtures in epidemiology beneficial?Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Review
- Polychlorinated biphenyls and breast cancer: evidence, mechanisms, and risk management.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Prenatal Exposure to Emerging Pesticides and Childhood Allergy Risk: A Mixture Assessment in an Urban Birth Cohort.Environmental science & technology letters · 2025Article
- International fluoride symposium: effects of fluoride on human health and its mechanisms of action - a meeting report.BMC proceedings · 2025Article
- Application of Toxicologically Informed Relative Potency Factors to Examine Associations between Water Disinfection Byproducts and Birth Defects.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- The need for a cancer exposome atlas: a scoping review.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
- Exposome-wide association study of cognition among older adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Exposome · 2025Article
- Article
- Exposome-wide association study of cognition among older adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative characterization of the health impacts associated with exposure to chemical mixtures has received considerable attention in current environmental and epidemiological studies. With many existing statistical methods and emerging approaches, it is important for practitioners to understand which method is best suited for their inferential goals.
objectiveThe goal of this paper is to provide empirical simulation-based evidence regarding performance of mixture methods to help guide researchers on selecting the best available methods to address three scientific questions in mixtures analysis: identifying important components of a mixture, identifying interactions among mixture components, and creating a summary score for risk stratification and prediction.
methodsWe conducted a review and comparison of 11 analytical methods available for use in mixtures research through extensive simulation studies for continuous and binary outcomes. In addition, we carried out an illustrative data analysis using the PROTECT birth cohort from Puerto Rico to examine the associations between exposure to chemical mixtures-metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalates, and phenols-and birth outcomes.
resultsOur simulation results suggest that the choice of methods depends on the goal of analysis and that there is no clear winner across the board. For selection of important toxicants in the mixtures and for identifying interactions, Elastic net (Enet) by Zou et al., Lasso for Hierarchical Interactions (HierNet) by Bien et al., and selection of nonlinear interactions by a forward stepwise algorithm (SNIF) by Narisetty et al. have the most stable performance across simulation settings. For overall summary or a cumulative measure, we find that using the Super Learner to combine multiple environmental risk scores can lead to improved risk stratification and prediction properties.
conclusionsWe develop an integrated R package "CompMix" that provides a platform for mixtures analysis where the practitioners can implement a pipeline that includes several approaches for mixtures analysis. Our study offers guidelines for selecting appropriate statistical methods for addressing specific scientific questions related to mixtures research. We identify critical gaps where new and better methods are needed. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15305.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.