ArticlePloS one2025
Detection of pediatric developmental delay with machine learning technologies.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of artificial intelligence for outcome assessment in pediatric rehabilitation: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- From digital assistants to clinical partners: revolutionizing pediatric urology through large language model-powered decision support and patient education.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAccurate identification of children who will develop delay (DD) is challenging for therapists because recent studies have reported that children who underwent early intervention achieved more favorable outcomes than those who did not. In this study, we have investigated how the frequencies of three types of therapy, namely the physical therapy, the occupational therapy, and the speech therapy, received by a child can be exploited to predict whether the child suffers from DD or not. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is of high interest as these features can be obtained with essentially no cost and therefore a prediction model built accordingly can be employed to screen the subjects who may develop DD before advanced and costly diagnoses are carried out.
methodsThis study has been conducted based on a data set comprising the records of 2,552 outpatients (N = 34,862 visits, mean age = 72.34 months) collected at a hospital in Taiwan from 2012 to 2016. We then built 3 types of machine learning based prediction models, namely the deep neural network models (DNN), the support vector machine (SVM) models, and the decision tree (DT) models, to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
resultsExperimental results reveal that in terms of the F1 score, which is the harmonic mean of the sensitivity and the positive predictive value, the DT models outperformed the DNN models and the SVM models, if a high level of sensitivity is desired. In particular, the DT model developed in this study delivered the sensitivity at 0.902 and the positive predictive value at 0.723.
conclusionsWhat has been learned from this study is that the frequencies of the therapies that a child has received provide valuable information for predicting whether the child suffers from DD. Due to the performance observed in the experiments and the fact that these features can be obtained essentially without any cost, it is conceivable that the prediction models built accordingly can be wide exploited in clinical practices and significantly improve the treatment outcomes of the children who develop DD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.