ArticlePloS one2025
SMILE: Semi-supervised multi-view classification based on dynamical fusion.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semi-supervised multi-view classification plays a crucial role in understanding and utilizing existing multi-view data, especially in domains like medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. However, conventional semi-supervised multi-view classification methods often merely fuse features from multiple views without significantly improving classification performance. To address this issue, we propose a dynamic fusion approach for Semi-supervised Mult I-view c Lassification (SMILE). This approach leverages a high-level semantic mapping module to extract discriminative features from each view, reducing redundancy features. Furthermore, it introduces a dynamic fusion module to assess the quality of different views of different samples dynamically, diminishing the negative impact of low-quality views. We compare our method with six competitive methods on four datasets, exhibiting distinct advantages on the classification task, which demonstrates significant performance improvements across various evaluation metrics. Visualization experiments demonstrate that our approach is able to learn classification-friendly representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.