Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392756›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2025

Identification and validation of poly-metabolite scores for diets high in ultra-processed food: An observational study and post-hoc randomized controlled crossover-feeding trial.

Leila Abar, Eurídice Martínez Steele, Sang Kyu Lee, Lisa Kahle, Steven C Moore, Eleanor Watts, Caitlin P O'Connell, Charles E Matthews, Kirsten A Herrick, Kevin D Hall and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03268577 completednot on this map

Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA): Biomarker Based Validation Study of Internet-Based and Conventional Self-Report Instruments for Assessing Diet and Physical Activity Within AARP

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2012 to 2013Enrolled1,130ConditionsHealthy SubjectArmsInternet-Based Intervention, Monitoring Device, Questionnaire Administration
NCT03407053 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Ultra Processed Versus Unprocessed Diets on Energy Intake

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsHealthy DietArmsUltra-processed diet, Unprocessed diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. High-dimensional partial linear model with trend filtering.Electronic journal of statistics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Goals in Nutrition Science 2025-2030.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Leila AbarDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-7150
Eurídice Martínez SteeleDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3777-1533
Sang Kyu LeeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Biostatistics Branch, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Lisa KahleInformation Management Services, Inc. Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Steven C MooreDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8169-1661
Eleanor WattsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9229-2589
Caitlin P O'ConnellDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-4584
Charles E MatthewsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-3103
Kirsten A HerrickDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8646-599X
Kevin D HallLaboratory of Biological Modeling, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4062-3133
Lauren E O'ConnorDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-5756
Neal D FreedmanDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0074-1098
Rashmi SinhaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Hyokyoung G HongDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Biostatistics Branch, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4280-6243
Erikka LoftfieldDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-8748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltra-processed food (UPF) accounts for a majority of calories consumed in the United States, but the impact on human health remains unclear. We aimed to identify poly-metabolite scores in blood and urine that are predictive of UPF intake. METHODS AND

findingsOf the 1,082 Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03268577) participants, aged 50-74 years, who provided biospecimen consent, n = 718 with serially collected blood and urine and one to six 24-h dietary recalls (ASA-24s), collected over 12-months, met eligibility criteria and were included in the metabolomics analysis. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure >1,000 serum and urine metabolites. Average daily UPF intake was estimated as percentage energy according to the Nova system. Partial Spearman correlations and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were used to estimate UPF-metabolite correlations and build poly-metabolite scores of UPF intake, respectively. Scores were tested in a post-hoc analysis of a previously conducted randomized, controlled, crossover-feeding trial (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03407053) of 20 subjects who were admitted to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to consume ad libitum diets that were 80% or 0% energy from UPF for 2 weeks immediately followed by the alternate diet for 2 weeks; eligible subjects were between 18-50 years old with a body mass index of >18.5 kg/m2 and weight-stable. IDATA participants were 51% female, and 97% completed ≥4 ASA-24s. Mean intake was 50% energy from UPF. UPF intake was correlated with 191 (of 952) serum and 293 (of 1,044) 24-h urine metabolites (FDR-corrected P-value < 0.01), including lipid (n = 56 serum, n = 22 24-h urine), amino acid (n = 33, 61), carbohydrate (n = 4, 8), xenobiotic (n = 33, 70), cofactor and vitamin (n = 9, 12), peptide (n = 7, 6), and nucleotide (n = 7, 10) metabolites. Using LASSO regression, 28 serum and 33 24-h urine metabolites were selected as predictors of UPF intake; biospecimen-specific scores were calculated as a linear combination of selected metabolites. Overlapping metabolites included (S)C(S)S-S-Methylcysteine sulfoxide (rs = -0.23, -0.19), N2,N5-diacetylornithine (rs = -0.27 for serum, -0.26 for 24-h urine), pentoic acid (rs = -0.30, -0.32), and N6-carboxymethyllysine (rs = 0.15, 0.20). Within the cross-over feeding trial, the poly-metabolite scores differed, within individual, between UPF diet phases (P-value for paired t test < 0.001). IDATA Study participants were older US adults whose diets may not be reflective of other populations.

conclusionsPoly-metabolite scores, developed in IDATA participants with varying diets, are predictive of UPF intake and could advance epidemiological research on UPF and health. Poly-metabolite scores should be evaluated and iteratively improved in populations with a wide range of UPF intake.

Indexed as

DietFast FoodsAgedBiomarkersCross-Over StudiesEnergy IntakeFemaleFood, ProcessedHumansMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40392756
PMCPMC12091781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.