Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392669›Full record

GuidelineSystematic biology2025

Type Genomics: A Framework for Integrating Genomic Data into Biodiversity and Taxonomic Research.

Harald Letsch, Carola Greve, Anna K Hundsdoerfer, Iker Irisarri, Jenna M Moore, Marianne Espeland, Stefan Wanke, Umilaela Arifin, Mozes P K Blom, Carolina Corrales and 21 more

Abstract readGuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Systematic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of genomics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Harald LetschDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-4855
Carola GreveSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Anna K HundsdoerferSenckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Museum of Zoology, Königsbrücker Landstr. 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5594-4154
Iker IrisarriDepartamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Jenna M MooreLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum of Nature Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Marianne EspelandLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6800-4783
Stefan WankeSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Umilaela ArifinLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum of Nature Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Mozes P K BlomMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Research, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6304-9827
Carolina CorralesLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Alexander DonathLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Uwe FritzSenckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Museum of Zoology, Königsbrücker Landstr. 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-7214
Gunther KöhlerSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Patrick KückLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Sarah LemerLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum of Nature Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Ximo MengualLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6185-9404
Nancy Mercado SalasLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum of Nature Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Karen MeusemannLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Anja PalandačićNatural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Christian PrintzenSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Julia D SigwartSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Karina L Silva-BrandãoLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum of Nature Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Marianna SimõesSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Madlen StangeLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4559-2535
Alexander SuhLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Nikolaus SzucsichNatural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Ekin TilicSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Till TöpferLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Astrid BöhneLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1284-3115
Axel JankeInstitute of Ecology, Evolution & Diversity, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
Steffen U PaulsSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P32029-BCentre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG) LOEWE/1/10/519/03/03.001(0014)/52Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's Horizon Europe Guarantee Scheme and by the Leibniz Association and the DFG 466783002Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's Horizon Europe Guarantee Scheme and by the Leibniz Association and the DFG 492407022Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's Horizon Europe Guarantee Scheme and by the Leibniz Association and the DFG 497674620DFG 546888221ERDF/EU PID2023-152168NB-I00ERDF/EU RyC2022-038245-IESF+German Research Foundation, DFG RI 1817/5-1Horizon Europe under the Biodiversity, Circular Economy, and Environment (REA.B.3)Leibniz Association SAW/J96-2020MICIU/AEI 10.13039/501100011033Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) 22.00173UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Name-bearing type specimens have a fundamental role in characterizing biodiversity, as these objects represent the physical link between a scientific name and the biological organism. Type specimens are usually deposited in natural history collections, which provide key infrastructure for research on essential biological structures and processes, while preserving records of biodiversity for future generations. Modern systematics increasingly depends on genetic and genomic data to differentiate and characterize species. While the results of genome sequencing are often connected to a physical voucher specimen, they are rarely derived from the ultimate taxonomic reference for a species, that is, the name-bearing type specimens. This is a known but underappreciated problem for ensuring the replicability of findings, especially those that affect the interpretation of biodiversity distributions and phylogenetic relationships. Destructive sampling of museum specimens, particularly of type material, often carries a high risk of sequencing failure, and thus the cost of damage to the specimen may outweigh the resulting benefit. Both taxonomic work and genome sequencing require specialist skills, and there are often communication gaps between the respective experts. A new, harmonized approach, maximizing information extraction while minimizing risk to type specimens, is a critical step forward toward linking disciplines across biodiversity research and promoting a better taxonomic and systematic understanding of eukaryotic diversity. The genetic makeup of a type specimen is a fundamental part of its biological information, which can and should be made freely and digitally available through type genomics. Here, we describe guidelines for the use of nomenclatural types in genome sequencing approaches, considering different kinds of types in different stages of preservation and different data types.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClassificationGenomicsPhylogenyAncient DNAbiodiversityDNA barcodinghistorical DNAholotypenatural history collectionstaxonomywhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40392669
PMCPMC12712332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.