ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Converging Representations of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism on Social Media: Linguistic and Topic Analysis of Trends in Reddit Data.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sentiment and Topic Analysis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Discussions on Chinese Social Media: Evidence From Bilibili and Rednote.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Symptom expression and coping strategies in women-focused attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder communities: a comparative natural language analysis of Reddit.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial media platforms have witnessed a substantial increase in mental health-related discussions, with particular attention focused on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism. This heightened interest coincides with growing neurodiversity advocacy. The impact of these changes in the conceptualization of ADHD and autism, and the relationship between the 2 conditions, remains underexplored.
objectiveWe aim to characterize and understand how the relationship between ADHD and autism has evolved in public discourse over the past decade and explore reasons for their growing alignment.
methodsUsing Reddit data from 2012 to 2022, we investigated the frequency of ADHD mentions in r/autism and autism mentions in r/ADHD, compared to commonly mentioned conditions. We analyzed user overlap between the 2 subreddits to track cross-subreddit discussions. Following this, we assessed changes in semantic similarity between ADHD and autism using Word2Vec embedding models, alongside commonly mentioned conditions. Finally, thematic changes in subreddit discussions were explored using BERT-based topic modeling across 2 time periods.
resultsOur analysis revealed that ADHD and autism have become progressively more associated across these multiple dimensions. In r/ADHD, there was a steep rise in the proportion of posts mentioning "autism" in 2021, overtaking "bipolar" and "OCD" (obsessive-compulsive disorder) to become the most frequently mentioned condition. Similarly, ADHD mentions increased steadily in r/autism, while the frequency of posts mentioning "OCD," "PTSD" (posttraumatic stress disorder), and "bipolar" remained stable and low. User overlap between these subreddits grew substantially beginning in 2020. Semantic analysis showed ADHD and autism becoming more closely related from 2019 onward, compared to other conditions. Last, topic modeling indicated growing thematic convergence in ADHD- and autism-related discussions, which reflected an increasing shared emphasis on the experiences of adults with ADHD and autism, challenges in accessing diagnostic assessments, and interpersonal difficulties.
conclusionsOur study clarifies how discourse around these 2 conditions has converged during a period when they have both attracted rising public attention. These findings contribute to wider discussions about the impacts of rising public interest in mental health concepts. They illustrate that public understandings of relationships between conditions are dynamic and changing in ways that diverge from diagnostic frameworks. Future research should continue investigating changing mental health conceptualizations on social media, as these dynamics are becoming increasingly important for the future of psychiatric practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.