Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Exposure Therapy in Mixed Reality for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding functional cough in pediatrics: differentiating tic, psychogenic, and compulsive phenotypes for targeted intervention.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Exposure therapy in virtual reality (VR) is well established for anxiety disorders. While early studies show promise for VR-based exposure and response prevention (ERP) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a key challenge of traditional VR is the weak sense of presence, deemed crucial for effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ERP in mixed reality (MERP). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included 2 outpatient treatment groups, MERP vs self-guided ERP (SERP) from March 15, 2022, to October 26, 2024. Participants were required to be 18 to 80 years of age and have contamination-related OCD (C-OCD). Exclusion criteria consisted of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, severe substance use disorder, acute suicidality, and ongoing inpatient treatment. Patients' symptom severity was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) before (baseline) and after the 6-week intervention period as well as 3 months after posttreatment (follow-up). Intervention: Six sessions of MERP or SERP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcome was the severity of OCD symptoms in the past 7 days on the Y-BOCS. Sense of presence and subjective appraisal were the secondary outcomes. Results: Thirty-six participants fulfilled inclusion criteria. Twenty-four participants (66.7%) were female; mean (SD) age was 35.42 (14.03) years. Both groups had severe OCD symptoms, with major depressive disorder as the most common comorbidity (23 [63.9%]). Twenty-nine participants (80.6%) completed the postintervention and follow-up assessments. At baseline, patients in the MERP group had a mean (SD) Y-BOCS score of 26.94 (5.83), while the SERP group had a mean (SD) score of 24.22 (4.12). The decline in patients' OCD symptoms (Y-BOCS) was similar in the MERP (mean difference, 3.15) and the SERP groups (mean difference, 1.47) (ηp2 = 0.002; 95% CI, -3.187 to 3.893). Significant improvements were observed within the MERP group from baseline to post treatment across several psychopathological variables, including OCD symptoms, with a medium to large effect (Cohen d, 0.584-0.931; 95% CI, 0.026-1.551). Sense of presence was moderate (mean [SD], ≤3.24 [≤2.07]). Subjective appraisal was heterogeneous. Conclusions: This RCT on MERP in C-OCD provided important insights. While there were no significant between-group differences, changes in psychopathology within the MERP group suggest some level of effectiveness. However, the limited impact indicates that the full potential of MERP has not yet been realized, and future research should aim to improve immersion and overall effectiveness. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Registry: DRKS00020969.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.