ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025
Japanese narrow band imaging expert team classification of colorectal polyps: A validation study from India.
Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJapanese narrow band imaging expert team (JNET) classification has a diagnostic accuracy above 90% in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colonic polyps as well as estimating the depth of invasion in colorectal cancer. However, its validation outside Japan is limited to expert centers and requires magnifying endoscopes. AIMS AND
methodsThis study aimed at validating the JNET classification prospectively in a real-world setting in India using magnifying endoscopes with dual focus. We analyzed consecutive patients with colonic polyps detected via these endoscopes. The JNET classification was compared with histopathology, the gold standard and its diagnostic accuracy was assessed.
resultsTotal 203 consecutive patients with colonic polyps underwent examination using a magnifying endoscope with dual focus. In real time, 331 polyps were identified and classified based on the JNET classification. Among them, 15 polyps could not be retrieved, leaving 316 polyps for histopathological comparison in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of each JNET classification type, along with their 95% confidence intervals, are as follows. For Type-1 JNET classification, the values are 78% (69-86), 97% (94-99), 92% (84-97), 92% (87-95) and 92% (88-94), respectively. Type-2 A JNET classification has corresponding values of 92% (86-96), 84% (78-89), 82% (75-88), 93% (88-97) and 88% (84-91). For Type-2B JNET classification, the values are 45% (24-68), 97% (95-99), 56% (31-78), 96% (93-98) and 93% (90-96). Lastly, Type-3 JNET classification has values of 95% (87-99), 98% (96-100), 94% (85-98), 99% (97-100) and 98% (96-99), respectively.
conclusionsThe JNET classification has good accuracy in characterizing colonic polyps using magnifying endoscopes with dual focus. Large-volume, multicentric data is necessary to validate the findings in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.