ReviewClinical and experimental nephrology2025
Therapeutics controversies in antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Review in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is characterized by inflammation of small- to medium-sized blood vessels with ANCAs. Induction therapy has historically involved cyclophosphamide (CYC) and glucocorticoids (GCS), with rituximab (RTX) emerging as a preferred alternative. Studies addressed the efficacy of RTX in severe kidney diseases, showing results comparable to CYC. In severe diseases that are unsuitable for high-dose CYC, combined RTX and low-dose CYC demonstrate promising results. There is a recent trend to administer low-dose GCS to reduce infections and other complications. Recent trials have questioned the broader role of plasma exchange (PLEX), influencing guidelines' updates. Current indications for PLEX include severe kidney dysfunction, positive glomerular basement membrane antibody, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage that requires oxygen support at presentation. Maintenance therapy options include azathioprine, RTX, and methotrexate. RTX's efficacy as a maintenance agent was demonstrated in trials. However, controversies in dosing frequency persist. The optimal duration of maintenance therapy remains debated, with guidelines suggesting 18-48 months. More recent studies proposed longer durations to reduce the risk of relapse, thus challenging existing guidelines. Complement involvement in AAV has been increasingly recognized. Studies show that complement 3 depositions in the glomeruli correlate with severe disease and complement inhibitors such as avacopan demonstrated efficacy in the management of AAV. Other complement inhibitors, such as eculizumab and vilobelimab, are being explored. In conclusion, AAV management has made significant advances, but controversies persist. Future research should refine therapeutic regimens and explore novel targeted treatments for personalized medicine in AAV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.