ReviewMolecular diversity2025
Machine learning approaches for predicting the small molecule-miRNA associations: a comprehensive review.
Review in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are evolutionarily conserved small regulatory elements that are ubiquitous in cells and are found to be abnormally expressed during the onset and progression of several human diseases. miRNAs are increasingly recognized as potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets that could be inhibited by small molecules (SMs). The knowledge of SM-miRNA associations (SMAs) is sparse, mainly because of the dynamic and less predictable 3D structures of miRNAs that restrict the high-throughput screening of SMs. Toward augmenting the costly and laborious experiments determining the SM-miRNA interactions, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a cost-effective and efficient platform. In this article, various aspects associated with the ML-guided predictions of SMAs are thoroughly reviewed. Firstly, a detailed account of the SMA data resources useful for algorithms training is provided, followed by an elaboration of various feature extraction methods and similarity measures utilized on SMs and miRNAs. Subsequent to a summary of the ML algorithms basics and a brief description of the performance measures, an exhaustive census of all the 32 ML-based SMA prediction methods developed so far is outlined. Distinctive features of these methods have been described by classifying them into six broad categories, namely, classical ML, deep learning, matrix factorization, network propagation, graph learning, and ensemble learning methods. Trend analyses are performed to investigate the patterns in ML algorithms usage and performance achievement in SMA prediction. Outlining key principles behind the up-to-date methodologies and comparing their accomplishments, this review offers valuable insights into critical areas for future research in ML-based SMA prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.