Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392436›Full record

ArticlePsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2025

Psychological insight into corruption: construction and validation of the Corrupt Intention Scale (CIS).

Carlos Ramón Ponce-Díaz, Jesús Joel Aiquipa-Tello, Edgard Fernando Pacheco-Luza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos Ramón Ponce-DíazInstituto Científico de Investigación, Universidad Andina del Cusco, Urb. Ingeniería Larapa Grande A-7, San Jerónimo, Cusco, Peru.
Jesús Joel Aiquipa-TelloInstituto Científico de Investigación, Universidad Andina del Cusco, Urb. Ingeniería Larapa Grande A-7, San Jerónimo, Cusco, Peru. jesus.aiquipat@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-6908
Edgard Fernando Pacheco-LuzaInstituto Científico de Investigación, Universidad Andina del Cusco, Urb. Ingeniería Larapa Grande A-7, San Jerónimo, Cusco, Peru.

Funding

Instituto Científico, Universidad Andina de Cusco RESOLUTION No. 017-CU-2022-UAC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorruption, as a psychosocial problem, impacts institutional stability and interpersonal trust. From a psychological perspective, the study of this phenomenon has focused on analyzing corrupt behavior. However, empirical evidence on the measurement of corrupt behavior remains limited due to its covert nature. An alternative strategy is to assess corrupt intent, as it allows inferring behavioral patterns without resorting to direct observation of these acts.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to construct and validate the Corrupt Intention Scale (CIS), taking the theory of planned behavior as a framework.

methodsWe conducted a multiple study with a total of 1, 488 Peruvian adults. Multivariate statistical techniques such as exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used.

resultsWe found that the CIS presented evidence of internal structure validity for a 12-item model grouped into three correlated factors. It showed measurement invariance with respect to sex, convergent validity and satisfactory reliability.

conclusionThe CIS presents psychometric properties that support its use to measure corrupt intent, and can be used in evaluation, research and prevention contexts. In a global context where corruption remains a critical challenge, reliable and valid measures strengthen the basis for future research and mitigation programs.

Indexed as

AssessmentCorrupt behaviorCorrupt intentPsychometric propertiesTheory of Planned Behavior

Identifiers

PMID40392436
PMCPMC12092907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.