ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Prognostic factors for progression free survival in patients with medullary thyroid cancer: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) experience recurrent or persistent disease after surgery due to its aggressive nature. However, the prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) have been poorly investigated. This study aimed to explore prognostic factors associated with PFS in patients with MTC. Patients with MTC were enrolled from 15 medical centers in Shandong Province, China, between January 2010 and December 2021. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to explore the prognostic factors for PFS in patients with MTC. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) in predicting PFS. Patients with MTC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were used to test the predictive value of the LNR cutoff for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). In the Shandong cohort, extrathyroidal extension (HR, 1.622; 95% CI 1.022-2.575, P = 0.040), LNR (HR, 2.806; 95% CI 1.121-7.025, P = 0.028), and T3 stage (HR, 2.060; 95% CI 1.074-3.952, P = 0.030) were independent risk factors for PFS in patients with MTC. The optimal cutoff value of the LNR for predicting PFS was 0.19. Compared to patients with LNR < 0.19, those with LNR ≥ 0.19 suffered worse PFS (Log-rank P < 0.0001) in the Shandong cohort, and worse OS (Log-rank P < 0.0001) and DSS (Log-rank P < 0.0001) in the SEER cohort. This study identified prognostic factors for PFS in patients with MTC. LNR ≥ 0.19 could be used as an adverse prognostic factor for patients with MTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.