ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Development of the Resilience Scale for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Republic of Korea.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a resilience measurement scale for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). Through interviews with PLWHA, resilience attributes were identified, resulting in 42 initial items. After validating construct validity, three items were excluded, leaving 39 items for further testing. Data were collected from 228 participants across two hospitals, the Korean Association for AIDS Prevention in Seoul, a Daegu branch, and two HIV-related self-help groups between April 3 and September 23, 2017. Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors and 25 items, explaining 69.43% of the total variance: positive feeling, antiretroviral agent management, information and resource use, positive relationships, and interaction. The final scale included 19 items across these five factors. Criterion, convergent, and discriminant validity were confirmed through correlations with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, resilience for PLWHA, and measures of depression and anxiety, respectively. Reliability was supported with a Cronbach's α of 0.89 and test-retest reliability of 0.67. The scale shows promise as a robust screening tool for resilience in PLWHA, applicable in diverse nursing practices and research domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.