ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Peripheral neuropathy associated with immunomodulatory drugs: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peripheral Neuropathy Associated With Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs: A Pharmacovigilance Disproportionality Analysis Using VigiBase.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral neuropathy requires early detection and intervention.
aimThis study aimed to examine the association between immunomodulatory medications (IMiDs; thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide) and peripheral neuropathy.
methodOpenVigil 2.1 was used to retrieve data associated with IMiDs and peripheral neuropathy from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Disproportionality analysis was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC) with a 95% credibility interval. Peripheral neuropathy signals were further prioritized using a rating scale.
resultsWe found 645 cases of peripheral neuropathy in 19,622 adverse event reports for thalidomide, 4849 cases in 197,866 adverse event reports for lenalidomide, and 933 cases in 40,582 adverse event reports for pomalidomide. Based on the clinical priority assessment, peripheral neuropathy was identified as having moderate clinical priority for the three immunomodulatory drugs (priority score = 6). In plasma cell myelomas, more peripheral neuropathy was reported for thalidomide [4.24% vs. 2.51%; ROR = 1.72 (1.42, 2.08); IC = 0.23 (0.05, 0.41)] and lenalidomide [2.71% vs. 1.06%, ROR = 2.59 (2.29, 2.91); IC = 0.14 (0.08, 0.20)] than in non-plasma cell myelomas. Peripheral neuropathy signals were detected in age groups 51-74, 63-74, and 51-62 for lenalidomide, thalidomide, and pomalidomide, respectively. No disproportionate gender differences were detected.
conclusionOur study indicated that the risk of peripheral neuropathy varied among patients with different indications and age subgroups for the same IMiD. Further investigation is required to verify these risk signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.