Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392353›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Dating long bone fractures of infants under one year of age.

Amandine Capelli, Luisa Nogueira, Frédéric Santos, Béatrice Leloutre, Marco Albertario, Caroline Bernardi, Véronique Alunni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amandine CapelliInstitut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice cedex 2, 06107, France. capelli.a@chu-nice.fr.
Luisa NogueiraInstitut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice cedex 2, 06107, France.
Frédéric SantosAllée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, UMR 5199 PACEA, CNRS-MCC, Université de Bordeaux, Batiment, Pessac Cedex, B8A, 50023, 33615, CS, France.
Béatrice LeloutreService de radiologie de l'Hôpital Pédiatrique Nice CHU-Lenval, 57 avenue de la Californie, Nice, 06200, France.
Marco AlbertarioService de radiologie de l'Hôpital Pédiatrique Nice CHU-Lenval, 57 avenue de la Californie, Nice, 06200, France.
Caroline BernardiInstitut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice cedex 2, 06107, France.
Véronique AlunniInstitut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice cedex 2, 06107, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants under one year of age frequently suffer from inflicted fractures. Dating the trauma is vitally important to identify the perpetrator and ensure the protection of the child. While several studies have investigated the radiological dating of fractures in children, few have focused specifically on those occurring during the first year of life. Although maltreatment is particularly common in the first few months of life, dating these fractures remains challenging, as bone healing capacity is age-dependent and may differ from that observed in older children. In addition, the radiological nomenclature found in the literature is heterogeneous and often imprecise.The aim of this study was to apply clearly defined radiographic criteria to establish an analytical methodology that facilitates the dating of long bone fractures in infants under one year of age. A total of 99 infants under one year old with long bone fractures of known date were included, representing 290 radiograph sets. Four dating groups were defined based on literature data, with the aim of developing predictive models based on well-defined radiographic features, in order to construct a simplified dating decision tree.Our findings suggest that the absence of periosteal apposition and bone remodeling is consistent with a fracture less than one week old. On the other hand, the presence of periosteal apposition suggests a fracture that is probably one to eight weeks old, and more than one month old when accompanied by signs of remodeling. Finally, isolated signs of remodeling are suggestive of a fracture of more than two months.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonFractures, BoneBone RemodelingChild AbuseDecision TreesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRadiographyAccidental injuryBone healingChild abuseForensic medicineFractureFracture datingInfantPediatric radiology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.