Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392352›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Literature reviews: typology and forensic applications.

Ademir Franco, Wahaj Anees, Débora Moreira, Cauane Blumenberg, Marcelo Napimoga, Luiz Renato Paranhos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ademir FrancoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Office 03, Block E, Swift, Campinas, Postal code: 13.045-755, SP, Brazil. franco.gat@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-2781
Wahaj AneesDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Office 03, Block E, Swift, Campinas, Postal code: 13.045-755, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5502-2747
Débora MoreiraDivision of Oral Radiology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2024-9976
Cauane BlumenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-3849
Marcelo NapimogaLaboratory of Neuroimmune Interface of Pain Research, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-365X
Luiz Renato ParanhosDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-0120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary research models, such as literature reviews, are designed to summarize existing primary data. Literature reviews serve distinct purposes depending on their methodology and scope. In forensic science, they have been widely used to recover historical information, facilitate bibliometric investigations, compile and compare analytical techniques, promote best practices, and support decision-making. This study presented a comprehensive description of common literature review types, namely (1) narrative, (2) integrative, (3) scoping, (4) systematic (with or without meta-analysis), (5) bibliometric, and (6) umbrella reviews, highlighting their specific characteristics and applications in forensic science. Forensic experts, students, instructors, and research authors and readers must be familiar with the typology and appropriate use of literature reviews to effectively select the most suitable approach for their studies and professional practice. In this context, the goal of academic research, as pursued in the present work, is to strengthen forensic knowledge, enhance theoretical rigor, and ultimately improve practices in the field through education in scientific research methodology.

Indexed as

Forensic SciencesReview Literature as TopicBibliometricsHumansDentistry forensicForensicLiterature reviewMedicine forensicScience systematic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.