ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Association of lung ultrasound score with large patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates during the transitional period.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lung ultrasound assessment of pulmonary effects of large patent ductus arteriosus in extremely preterm infants beyond the transitional period.The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies suggested lung ultrasound (LU) as a useful, non-invasive bedside tool for assessing pulmonary edema; however, its utility in identifying preterm neonates with large patent ductus arteriosus (L-PDA) is limited. The objective of the study is to evaluate the association of LU score (LUS) in preterm neonates with L-PDA during the transitional period and explore correlation of LUS with echocardiographic indicators. Among 152 neonates born < 29 weeks' gestation and had LU performed at day-of-life (DOL) three for a previous prospective study, 54 neonates had concomitant echocardiography (Echo) documenting PDA presence, diameter, and variables for shunt volume. We included in the analysis neonates who had LU and Echo on DOL 3. Neonates with L-PDA were compared to those with absent or small PDA. Univariate, multivariate, and Pearson's correlation coefficients analyses were conducted. Of the 54 infants included in the study, 32 (59%) were diagnosed with L-PDA. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the L-PDA and no-L-PDA group. Univariate analysis showed no association between LUS and L-PDA. Similarly, multivariate analysis found that a one-point increment of LUS was not associated to L-PDA (adjusted OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.89-1.59). LUS demonstrated a significant correlation with respiratory severity score and a weak correlation with PDA diameter, but no significant associations with other PDA shunt volume variables.
conclusionIn this cohort, LUS was not associated with L-PDA during the transition period. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings and further explore the clinical utility of LUS in assessing PDA. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive tool for assessing pulmonary edema in preterm neonates. • Previous studies have reported a positive correlation between LUS score and hemodynamically significant PDA. WHAT IS NEW: • In this cohort of preterm neonates 29 weeks, LUS was not associated with large PDA during the transitional period (DOL 3). • LUS showed correlation with respiratory severity but not with echocardiographic markers of PDA shunt volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.