ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025
Global trends and hotspots in the learning curves of robotic-assisted surgery: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multi-database bibliometric analysis and cross-database comparison of NOSES research in colorectal cancer: integrated evidence from WoSCC and PubMed.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Suggestions and insights from 28 bibliometric studies in the Journal of Robotic Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- 10,000 robotic surgeries in Brazil: lessons learned and the path forward.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Global research hotspots and emerging trends in orthopedic robotic surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Global research landscape of robot-assisted surgical training: a 35-year bibliometric and visualization analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Research hotspots and trends of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a bibliometric analysis (2006-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal diseases: a bibliometric and visualization.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Thoughts on the Global Trends and hotspots of the learning curve for robot-assisted surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the number of research papers published in the field of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). Nevertheless, systematic analyses focusing on the key hotspots associated with the learning curves (LCs) of RAS, global collaboration models, and future trends remain relatively limited. This study employed bibliometric methods to conduct a comprehensive search and analysis of papers on the LC of RAS published in the Web of Science Core Collection between 2005 and 2025. A visual analysis was performed across multiple dimensions, including countries, institutions, sources, and authors. The results revealed an upward trend in the number of publications, with a peak observed in 2024. The United States ranked first in terms of publication volume, while Yonsei University emerged as the most productive institution. Mottrie Alexandre contributed to the highest number of publications, and Dindo d received the highest number of citations. Frequently occurring keywords included "outcome", "experience", "minimally invasive surgery", "revision", and "laparoscopic surgery". Clustering keywords were associated with "rectal cancer", "en-y gastric bypass", "transoral robotic surgery", "spine surgery", and "endometrial cancer". Furthermore, the top five keywords with the strongest citation bursts were "laparoscopic radical prostatectomy", "total mesorectal excision", "da vinci", "prostatectomy", and "mrc clasicc trial". This study offers valuable insights into the future development of this field and supports further exploration and innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392339What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.