ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes on Short Tape Single-Incision Sling Devices (Solyx) and Adjustable Length Device (I-Stop-Mini) for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence at 1 Year.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe study is primarily aimed at comparing the outcome of voiding dysfunction related to over-tension and the resumption of normal voiding after tension-releasing suture (TRS) manipulation following Solyx and I-stop-mini procedures. Second, it is aimed at determining the cure rate, complications, and quality of life at 1 year postoperatively.
methodsThis is a retrospective study conducted from March 2015 to June 2023. Patients with clinically confirmed pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence were included; those with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) greater than stage II, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or post-void residual of more than 100 ml were excluded. Standardized preoperative evaluations and TRS were used. Follow-ups were conducted at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and annually. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.
resultsOut of 453 patients, 333 underwent Solyx and 120 underwent I-stop-mini procedures. The mean age was 56.6 years with an average BMI of 25.4. After Solyx, 18.9% had urinary retention whereas 10.8% had urinary retention after I-stop-mini. TRS manipulation was done in 12% post-Solyx and 4.2% post-I-stop-mini. Objective cure rates were 87.1% for Solyx and 91.7% for the I-stop-mini, with no statistical difference. Two patients in the Solyx group required repeat mid-urethral sling surgery. No cases of mesh erosion were noted in either of the groups.
conclusionsSolyx and I-stop-mini are both effective at treating SUI. A short-tape single-incision sling device (Solyx) resulted in more voiding dysfunction than the adjustable-length device (I-stop-mini). TRS helps to resolve postoperative voiding dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.