ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2025
Genomic AT Bias Coupled with Amino Acid Metabolism Modulates Codon Usage.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Encoding of protein-coding sequences in a genome through evolution leads to characteristic proportions of codons and amino acids. Here, we present a simplified maximum entropy model that groups together codons with the same GC (guanine + cytosine) content and coding for the same amino acid and accounts for the stoichiometry of genetic elements in over 50000 genomes with seven interpretable parameters. Our model includes both the cost of a codon given a genomic GC content and the metabolic cost of the corresponding amino acid. Both costs are essential for accurate prediction of codon and amino acid abundances. The best implementation of the model includes a universal equilibrium value for the genomic GC content below 50%, as suggested by the literature. It also splits the twenty amino acids in two groups forming strong (bases C and G) or weak (bases A and U) Watson Crick base pairs with the anticodon, differing in the strength of GC-dependent selection. The entropy-cost trade-off suggests that each organism has sorted out the genome encoding problem given a value for its genomic GC content. The empirical boundaries to this trade-off suggest minimal values for the amino acid and codon entropies, which may limit the GC content of natural genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.