ArticleEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)2026
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in France with low-dose computed tomography.
Article in European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer is the third most frequent cancer in France. It has a poor prognosis when patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can detect early-stage cancer. In addition, blood-based biomarkers could help select patients for lung cancer screening or manage indeterminate lung nodules. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the French context including LDCT and biomarkers. A microsimulation model calibrated for France was used to compare four strategies: no screening, biennial LDCT, biennial LDCT followed by biomarkers, and biennial screening with biomarkers followed by LDCT. Screening eligibility included age (50-74) and smoking history (>15 cigarettes/day over 25 years, or 10 cigarettes/day over 30 years, or former smokers who quit less than 10 years ago). A 25% participation rate was assumed. Direct medical costs were estimated from the perspective of the French health system. Cost and outcomes were discounted at 2.5%. Screening decreased lifetime lung cancer mortality from 2 to 12% depending on the participation rate, leading to an increase in both life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Considering cost effectiveness, LDCT screening was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7629 per QALY in comparison to the absence of screening. Sensitivity analyses were all favorable to LDCT-based screening strategies. Biennial LDCT screening could be an effective and cost-effective strategy in France even at a 25% participation rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.