Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392283›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)2026

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in France with low-dose computed tomography.

Henri Leleu, Quentin Berkovitch, Julia Bonastre, Caroline Caramella, Étienne Giroux-Leprieur, Lucile Lefèvre, Pernelle Lavaud, Andreea Todea, Marie Wislez, Paul Hofman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Henri LeleuPublic Health Expertise, Paris.
Quentin BerkovitchPublic Health Expertise, Paris.
Julia BonastreBureau Biostatistique et Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay.
Caroline CaramellaRadiology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis-Robinson.
Étienne Giroux-LeprieurDepartment of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Oncology, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, EA 4340 BECCOH, APHP-Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt.
Lucile LefèvreJanssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Issy-les-Moulineaux.
Pernelle LavaudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif.
Andreea TodeaJanssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Issy-les-Moulineaux.
Marie WislezUnité d'Oncologie Thoracique, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université, Paris.
Paul HofmanIHU RespirERA, FHU OncoAge, Laboratoire de Pathologie Clinique et Expérimentale, BB-0033-00025, Hôpital Pasteur 1, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Funding

Janssen-Cilag France
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the third most frequent cancer in France. It has a poor prognosis when patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can detect early-stage cancer. In addition, blood-based biomarkers could help select patients for lung cancer screening or manage indeterminate lung nodules. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the French context including LDCT and biomarkers. A microsimulation model calibrated for France was used to compare four strategies: no screening, biennial LDCT, biennial LDCT followed by biomarkers, and biennial screening with biomarkers followed by LDCT. Screening eligibility included age (50-74) and smoking history (>15 cigarettes/day over 25 years, or 10 cigarettes/day over 30 years, or former smokers who quit less than 10 years ago). A 25% participation rate was assumed. Direct medical costs were estimated from the perspective of the French health system. Cost and outcomes were discounted at 2.5%. Screening decreased lifetime lung cancer mortality from 2 to 12% depending on the participation rate, leading to an increase in both life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Considering cost effectiveness, LDCT screening was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7629 per QALY in comparison to the absence of screening. Sensitivity analyses were all favorable to LDCT-based screening strategies. Biennial LDCT screening could be an effective and cost-effective strategy in France even at a 25% participation rate.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRadiation Dosagebiomarkerscancer screeninglow-dose computed tomographylung cancersmoking

Identifiers

PMID40392283
PMCPMC13011944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.