ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Center Volume Not Associated with Survival Benefit of Inter-Hospital Transfer for Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the relationship between center volume and inpatient mortality among patients transferred to another hospital for pediatric cardiac surgery using contemporary real-world data. The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) cases for the years 2016 and 2019. Hospitals were divided into three groups based on terciles of volume: low: ≤ 103 cases/year, mid: 104-194 cases/year, and high: > 194 cases/year. Multilevel regression models were created to evaluate the association between volume and inpatient mortality for transferred patients, both for the entire cohort and for high-complexity cases. (Risk Stratification for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-2) categories 3,4, and 5). Of 25,749 patients undergoing cases on CPB, 3511 (13.6%) were preoperative inpatient transfers between hospitals. Compared to direct admissions, unadjusted mortality for patients who were transferred was higher in all groups: 1.7% vs 5.6% (low-volume), 1.1% vs 4.6% (mid-volume) and 1.1% vs 4.9% (high-volume). Compared to low-volume hospitals, inpatient mortality for patients admitted on transfer was not significantly different in mid-volume (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.54-1.34, p = 0.483) and high-volume centers (OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.45-1.12, p = 0.127) for the entire cohort. There was no significant difference in risk-adjusted inpatient mortality for high-complexity cases performed at mid-volume (OR 1.06, p = 0.845, 95% CI (0.62-1.85)) or high-volume hospitals (OR 0.82, p = 0.482, 95% CI (0.48-1.45)) compared to low-volume hospitals. Annual CPB case volume may not accurately predict risk-adjusted inpatient mortality for children transferred for pediatric cardiac surgery. Annual case volume alone should not dictate transfer for surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.