ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Children's
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe response to training of children's maximal aerobic power ( PURPOSE: To compile and analyze an unprecedentedly large literature database and use its findings to inform the formulation of a hypothesis for children's trainability deficit and its underlying causes.
methodsCohort size, age, pre-training
resultsChildren's mean overall INTERPRETATION AND HYPOTHESIS: While some of the factors proposed to-date may account, in part, for children's trainability deficit, none has explained why high-intensity training is advantageous in children but not in adults. Presently, only child-adult differences in neuromuscular activation and muscle functional composition can, on their own or in conjunction with other factors, comprehensively account for all observations. An extensive body of evidence is presented in support of the hypothesis and data interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40392270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.