ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Structure-metabolism relationships of 4-pentenyl synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists using in vitro human hepatocyte incubations and high-resolution mass spectrometry.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How structural variations in synthetic cannabinoids affect their metabolism: A pilot study on the in vivo metabolism of 8 synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- In vitro comparative assessment of metabolic stability and structure-metabolism relationships of five fentanyl analogs with varying N-acyl side chain lengths.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Outsmarting generic legislation: 4 years into the cat-and-mouse game of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist market since the Chinese ban in 2021.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid structural evolution and extensive metabolism of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) following consumption makes their detection in biological samples challenging, especially in urine. In vitro metabolite identification studies are an essential tool for identifying analytical targets to confirm SCRA consumption in clinical and forensic toxicology casework. Systematic studies on structurally related SCRAs allow structure-metabolism relationships (SMRs) to be determined, helping to predict the metabolites of emerging and future compounds. In this study, a series of amino acid-derived 4-pentenyl SCRAs and the OXIZID 4-pentenyl SCRA BZO-4en-POXIZID were incubated at 5 µM with pooled human hepatocytes for up to 3 h. Metabolites were identified using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) and SMRs investigated using the proportion that each type of biotransformation contributed to the total abundance of metabolites for each parent compound. Metabolites were mainly produced via terminal amide/ester hydrolysis, dihydrodiol formation on the tail, hydroxylation and N-dealkylation, but also by ketone formation, dehydrogenation, glucuronidation and combinations thereof. Methyl valinate (MMB) and ethyl valinate (EMB) SCRAs underwent extensive ester hydrolysis (90.9-96.0%), which was less dominant for methyl tert-leucinate (MDMB) SCRAs (47.6-60.7%), with dihydrodiol formation (24.3-27.7%) and hydroxylation (6.2-17.3%) becoming more prominent. For AB-4en-PICA and tert-leucinamide (ADB) SCRAs, hydroxylation was the major metabolic pathway (47.9-58.4%), while tail dihydrodiol formation was most prominent for BZO-4en-POXIZID (61.5%). Clear SMRs were identified for 4-pentenyl SCRAs and can be used to recommend biomarkers of consumption and aid prediction of metabolites of emerging and future SCRAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.