RevieweLife2025
Endometriosis is not the endometrium: Reviewing the over-representation of eutopic endometrium in endometriosis research.
Review in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytochemicals Modulating Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling Networks in Endometriosis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fascin-Centred Invasive Competence in Eutopic Endometrium: A Hypothesis-Driven Narrative Review of Endometriosis Pathogenesis and Non-Surgical Biomarker Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Patient-derived epithelial cell organoids mimic the phenotypic complexity of endometriosis subtypes.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Endometriosis as a Systemic and Complex Disease: Toward Phenotype-Based Classification and Personalized Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Eutopic Endometrium Immune Changes Involved in Development and Progression of Endometriosis: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Endometriosis: new insights and opportunities for relief of symptoms.Biology of reproduction · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a heterogenous disease with likely multiple pathogeneses and as-yet-undefined subtypes, progress in endometriosis treatment is currently limited by a lack of appropriate models and cohorts for research. Almost half of all publicly available datasets labelled as 'endometriosis' do not represent true disease as they are based on eutopic endometrium. Eutopic endometrial cells and tissues are frequently being used to represent endometriotic lesions, despite the unequivocal differences at both the tissue and cellular levels. As preclinical endometriosis research increases, it is important that the unique cellular and molecular profiles of endometrium and endometriosis are distinguished. Whilst each of these biospecimens can provide invaluable information to better understand disease aetiology and identify targets for diagnosis and treatment, it is imperative that the appropriate biospecimen and model are used to answer the relevant research question because endometriosis is not the endometrium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.