ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2025
Public awareness of testicular torsion is lacking in Edmonton.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe time from symptom onset to intervention dictates morbidity in testicular torsion (TT). Delayed presentation negatively impacts surgical outcomes and poor knowledge about TT is hypothesized to be a potential cause of delay. Our study characterizes baseline public awareness rates among families in Edmonton and assesses the association between awareness and TT outcomes.
methodsPatients and their caregivers completed surveys assessing TT awareness. Families were surveyed in two groups: those who presented with TT and age-matched controls. Affected families gave additional information about symptoms, time to notify parents, and present to the hospital. Outcomes were assessed at followup and through medical record review.
resultsOf 61 families, 18 (29.5%) patients and 22 (36.1%) parents had heard of TT. Among TT-affected patients (n=30), time to report symptoms (3.2 vs. 20.5 hours, p<0.01) and to arrive at hospital (3.0 vs. 20.8 hours, p<0.01) was significantly longer for patients requiring orchiectomy. Total time (odds ratio [OR] 0.992, p=0.01) and pain (OR 0.904, p=0.05) were associated with outcome. No differences in awareness were seen between patients who underwent orchiopexy vs. orchiectomy (23.8% vs. 25.0%, p>0.99).
conclusionsWe demonstrate that most Edmonton families have never heard of TT and that the pre-admission interval constitutes a substantial proportion of delays in surgery. Although time and pain ratings were associated with outcomes in TT, further evidence is required to demonstrate that awareness impacts outcomes significantly.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.