ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Optimization of recurrent rapid cycle breeding in maize for sustained long-term genetic improvement via stochastic simulations.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accelerated breeding modernization: a global blueprint for driving genetic gains, climate resilience, and food security in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the turnover of germplasm in plant breeding has substantially increased as the use of genomic information allows for earlier selection and the integration of controlled growing environments reduces the time to reach a particular growing stage. However, high generation turnover and intensive selection of lines before own yield trials are performed come at the risk of a drastic reduction of genetic diversity and lower prediction accuracies. To this end, we investigate strategies to cope with these challenges in a maize rapid cycle breeding scheme using stochastic simulations employing the software MoBPS. We find that genetic gains soon reach a plateau when only the original breeding material is phenotyped. Updating the training data set via additional phenotyping of crosses or doubled haploid lines ensures long-term progress with a gain of 6.80/6.95 genetic standard deviations (gSD) for the performance as a cross/DH after 30 cycles of breeding compared with 3.40/4.28 without additional phenotyping. Introducing genetic material from outside the breeding pool to introduce novel genetic diversity led to a further increase to 9.34/7.89 gSD. In particular, for the management of genetic diversity, further modifications of breeding program design are analysed to optimize the number of selected lines per cycle and to account for the relatedness of F2 plants in the selection using the software AlphaMate. Balancing short-term genetic gains with long-term diversity preservation is crucial for sustainable breeding. MoBPS provides a tool for quantifying these effects and provides solutions specific to the respective breeding program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.