Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40392116›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2025

Monitoring Attention in Self and Others.

Isaac R Christian, Samuel A Nastase, Mindy Yu, Kirsten Ziman, Michael S A Graziano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isaac R ChristianPrinceton University.
Samuel A NastasePrinceton University.
Mindy YuPrinceton University.
Kirsten ZimanPrinceton University.
Michael S A GrazianoPrinceton University.

Funding

NRSA Training Grant in Quantitative NeuroscienceT32MH065214 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Nathaniel Douglass Daw, KENNETH A NORMAN · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
AE Studios 24400B1459FA010NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of the brain to monitor its own attention is important for controlling attention. The ability to reconstruct and monitor the attention of others is important for behavioral prediction and therefore interaction with others. Do the same cortical networks participate in constructing a metacognitive representation of attention, whether one's own or someone else's attention? We studied the brain activity of human participants in an fMRI scanner. The participants performed two attention-monitoring tasks. One involved focusing attention on their own breathing and pressing a button when they realized their attention had wandered. In the other, participants watched a video of an actor performing the same focused-attention task, and participants pressed the button if the actor's attention appeared to have wandered. In both cases, we analyzed brain activity just before the button presses, when participants were engaged in metacognition with respect to attention. In the Self condition, activity was obtained in a distinctive set of areas including the TPJ, precuneus, dorsomedial pFC, anterior cingulate, and anterior insula. The activity partly overlapped the default mode network, social cognition network, and salience network. In the Other condition, activity was found in a similar set of areas including the TPJ, precuneus, dorsomedial pFC, anterior cingulate, and anterior insula. These results suggest that there may be a common set of cortical areas that provide an overarching mechanism for metacognition concerning attention, although Self and Other processing are also clearly not identical.

Indexed as

AttentionCerebral CortexMetacognitionAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40392116
PMCPMC13037715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.