ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2025
Monitoring Attention in Self and Others.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insular spontaneous activity changes after dialectical behavior therapy skills training for depressed patients with non-suicidal self-injury: a randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Meta-awareness, mind-wandering, and the control of automatic external and internal orientations of attention.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Bridging psychiatric and educational metacognition: a perspective on insight and learning.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of the brain to monitor its own attention is important for controlling attention. The ability to reconstruct and monitor the attention of others is important for behavioral prediction and therefore interaction with others. Do the same cortical networks participate in constructing a metacognitive representation of attention, whether one's own or someone else's attention? We studied the brain activity of human participants in an fMRI scanner. The participants performed two attention-monitoring tasks. One involved focusing attention on their own breathing and pressing a button when they realized their attention had wandered. In the other, participants watched a video of an actor performing the same focused-attention task, and participants pressed the button if the actor's attention appeared to have wandered. In both cases, we analyzed brain activity just before the button presses, when participants were engaged in metacognition with respect to attention. In the Self condition, activity was obtained in a distinctive set of areas including the TPJ, precuneus, dorsomedial pFC, anterior cingulate, and anterior insula. The activity partly overlapped the default mode network, social cognition network, and salience network. In the Other condition, activity was found in a similar set of areas including the TPJ, precuneus, dorsomedial pFC, anterior cingulate, and anterior insula. These results suggest that there may be a common set of cortical areas that provide an overarching mechanism for metacognition concerning attention, although Self and Other processing are also clearly not identical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.