ArticleThe Journal of craniofacial surgery2025
Human Auricles Are Not Symmetrical: A Comparative Study Using Landmark-Based and Surface-Based Software.
Article in The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the outcome of ear reconstruction, the contralateral auricle is often used as a reference. Literature has shown that auricles are symmetric on a group level, but it is unknown if this is also true on an individual level. In this paper, the authors quantify bilateral symmetry of the auricle and hypothesize that quantifying bilateral differences on an individual level requires a technique that is more precise than conventional manual measurement methods.
methodsCT sinus scans of 42 healthy volunteers were used to determine the bilateral symmetry of the auricle using conventional manual measurement techniques and a high-precision computer-assisted surface-based technique with a high precision of measurement. Bilateral symmetry was evaluated for the following geometric auricle parameters: length, width, protrusion distance, auriculocephalic angle, inclination angle, posteroanterior and superoinferior position difference. Bilateral differences exceeding the reliability threshold, based on the precision of measurement for the manual and automated approaches, were considered true differences.
resultsIn both the manual and automated measurements, the authors found no statistically significant differences in bilateral auricle parameters at the group level when evaluating a group of L versus R ears. At the individual level, however, the automated algorithm established bilateral differences in auricle parameters in 74% to 100% of the cases, whereas manual measurements could only detect bilateral differences in 7% to 64% of the cases.
conclusionsThe high-precision surface-based technique shows that human auricles are generally not symmetric on the individual level. Future research is needed to investigate which discrepancies are acceptable from a technical point of view and which left-right differences are considered acceptable from a cosmetic and reconstructive point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.