ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Is AMOEBA a Good Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Carbohydrates?
Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three Water Molecules Mediate Ring Opening of d‑Glucose in Aqueous Solutions.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
- Atomistic Insights into Conformations and Solvation Dynamics of Amylose, Dextran, and Pullulan Using Three Force Fields.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Capturing Carbohydrate Conformations and Hydration Interactions with a Polarizable Bond Dipole Potential.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the years, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been employed in the study of carbohydrates, with force fields such as CHARMM, AMBER/GLYCAM, and GROMOS. Although these force fields have achieved considerable success and played a pivotal role in our understanding of carbohydrate chemistry, growing interest has emerged in incorporating polarization effects to enhance the accuracy of simulations. In this perspective, we contemplate the advances that have been made in nonpolarizable and polarizable force fields to extract the key factors controlling accuracy in MD of carbohydrates. We find that the extreme hydrophilicity and conformational flexibility of carbohydrates pose challenges for most force fields. Overall, a force field suited for carbohydrates needs to include a water model developed consistently with the solute parameter sets, a soft van der Waals repulsion term at short distances, and polarization (whether implicit or explicit). We find that AMOEBA improves the prediction of hydration shell structure and dynamics, hydrogen bonding, and kinetics of diffusion, although it remains largely untested for conformational flexibility and glycosidic linkages. Nevertheless, AMOEBA's recent success in modeling monosaccharides without revisions of the potential energy functions or water model presents a promising avenue for future research. Such advances will provide deeper insights into the structure, dynamics, and interactions of these biologically and industrially relevant macromolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.