Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391956›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025

Evaluating tigecycline dosing for hospital-acquired pneumonia patients: insights from physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of lung exposure.

Xiaonan Zhang, Feiyan Liu, Sanwang Li, Zeneng Cheng, Hanxi Yi, Feifan Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Acquisition and Transmission ofInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaonan Zhang *Division of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0009-0007-7225-4009
Feiyan Liu *Division of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-2810
Sanwang LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zeneng ChengDivision of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hanxi YiDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Feifan XieDivision of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9038-2676

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University 2022ZZTS0850National Natural Science Foundation of China 82404769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tigecycline is increasingly used off-label for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), though its efficacy and optimal dosing remain uncertain. Lung exposure to tigecycline may be affected by pulmonary pH changes induced by bacterial infections. This study used a physiologically -based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to evaluate the impact of pH shifts on lung exposure and assess the efficacy of various dosing regimens. A lung PBPK model for tigecycline was developed and validated using plasma and lung concentration data from clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Simulations evaluated the impact of pH alterations from 6.6 (healthy) to 5.6 (infection) on lung exposure. Three clinical dosing regimens-standard (100 mg loading dose +50 mg q12h), median (150 mg loading dose +75 mg q12h), and high dose (200 mg loading dose +100 mg q12h)-were assessed by calculating the probability of target attainment (PTA) in lung compartments, including epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar cells (ACs), across a MIC range of 0.125-32 mg/L. The model reasonably captured tigecycline exposure in plasma and lung. Pulmonary pH alterations had minimal impact on tigecycline AUC in ELF but led to a significant 12.39-fold increase in AUC within ACs at pH 5.6. For pathogens with MIC ≤1 mg/L, all three dosing regimens achieved PTA ≥90% in ELF. However, for MIC >2 mg/L, only the high-dose regimen provided satisfactory PTA. The lung PBPK model provides valuable insights into tigecycline PK in HAP patients and underscores the need to optimize dosing for pneumonia with resistant pathogens.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHealthcare-Associated PneumoniaLungMinocyclinePneumonia, BacterialTigecyclineAdultAgedFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsMinocyclineTigecyclinedosing regimenlung exposurePBPK modelingpneumoniatigecycline

Identifiers

PMID40391956
PMCPMC12217487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.