ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025
Evaluating tigecycline dosing for hospital-acquired pneumonia patients: insights from physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of lung exposure.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Commonly Used Antibiotics in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- Acquisition and Transmission ofInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tigecycline is increasingly used off-label for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), though its efficacy and optimal dosing remain uncertain. Lung exposure to tigecycline may be affected by pulmonary pH changes induced by bacterial infections. This study used a physiologically -based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to evaluate the impact of pH shifts on lung exposure and assess the efficacy of various dosing regimens. A lung PBPK model for tigecycline was developed and validated using plasma and lung concentration data from clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Simulations evaluated the impact of pH alterations from 6.6 (healthy) to 5.6 (infection) on lung exposure. Three clinical dosing regimens-standard (100 mg loading dose +50 mg q12h), median (150 mg loading dose +75 mg q12h), and high dose (200 mg loading dose +100 mg q12h)-were assessed by calculating the probability of target attainment (PTA) in lung compartments, including epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar cells (ACs), across a MIC range of 0.125-32 mg/L. The model reasonably captured tigecycline exposure in plasma and lung. Pulmonary pH alterations had minimal impact on tigecycline AUC in ELF but led to a significant 12.39-fold increase in AUC within ACs at pH 5.6. For pathogens with MIC ≤1 mg/L, all three dosing regimens achieved PTA ≥90% in ELF. However, for MIC >2 mg/L, only the high-dose regimen provided satisfactory PTA. The lung PBPK model provides valuable insights into tigecycline PK in HAP patients and underscores the need to optimize dosing for pneumonia with resistant pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.