ArticleJournal of clinical apheresis2025
Impact of Voxelotor on Red Blood Cell Exchange Therapeutic Procedures: Evaluation of Multi-Institutional Procedure Data.
Article in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemoglobin S (HbS) polymerization inhibitor drugs such as voxelotor can result in a split peak in HbS as well as additional peaks with hemoglobin A in quantitative methods of HbS measurement. It is unclear how these results should be used to make transfusion decisions. The goal of this study is to compare RBC exchange (RBCX) replacement volumes calculated with HbS-Vox + HbS versus HbS alone. Patients aged 15-58 years who had variant hemoglobin quantitation performed for clinical care purposes with evidence of voxelotor treatment (split peak in HbS and/or additional peaks with hemoglobin A) were identified by investigator review of variant hemoglobin quantitation test results from the clinical laboratory. The RBCX replacement volume calculated with HbS% total (RBCX volume HbS% total) was compared to the RBCX replacement volume calculated with HbS unmod% (RBCX volume HbS unmod%) in each case. The mean difference between RBCX volume total HbS% and RBCX volume HbS% unmod is 398 mL with 95% CI (198, 598) and RBCX volume total HbS is significantly different from RBCX volume HbS unmod (p value = 0.0006). If the HbS total is not used to calculate RBCX replacement volumes in patients taking voxelotor, there is a significantly lower amount of RBC that would be ordered, which would lead to higher HbS after RBCX. Additional studies regarding the role of transfusion in such patients are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.