ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Using PINS pulses to saturate inflow effects on fMRI data at 3 and 7 T.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using PINS pulses to saturate inflow effects on fMRI data at 3 and 7 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo suppress inflow effects by saturating the magnetization within slice gaps.
methodsPower independent of number of slices (PINS) pulses was designed to saturate the magnetization in all slice gaps at once. The PINS saturation module was played before every excitation. The saturation and excitation profiles were validated in simulation and phantom experiments. To demonstrate the efficacy of the method to suppress inflow, experiments were performed using a flow phantom. As an example use-case, fMRI experiments with and without PINS inflow saturation were performed at 3 T and 7 T.
resultsSimulations and phantom experiments showed that the PINS saturation module successfully saturated the magnetization in the slice gaps without degrading the slice profile of the imaging slices. Flow phantom experiments showed that the PINS saturation module suppresses through-plane inflow better than no-gap acquisitions. In vivo fMRI experiments demonstrated that the PINS saturation module can be used to modulate the spin-echo BOLD signal. At 3 T application of PINS pulses to saturate the magnetization in the slice gaps resulted in approximately 25% fewer activated voxels (PINS-ON vs. PINS-OFF). Interestingly, at 7 T the activation patterns remained more similar and only approximately 10% fewer activated voxels were detected. The observed difference between 3 and 7 T may be linked to the relative shortening of the blood T
conclusionUsing PINS pulses, inflow effects from slice gaps were effectively and efficiently saturated. The proposed PINS saturation module can be used to further study the contribution of inflow effects in fMRI data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.