Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391598›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Using PINS pulses to saturate inflow effects on fMRI data at 3 and 7 T.

Shota Hodono, Chia-Yin Wu, Jin Jin, Jonathan R Polimeni, Martijn A Cloos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shota HodonoDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8107-5682
Chia-Yin WuCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6442-6954
Jin JinSiemens Healthineers Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-9329
Jonathan R PolimeniAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1348-1179
Martijn A CloosDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0636-234X

Funding

Project 4U19NS123717 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI LINNINGER, ANDREAS A · 2021 to 2025
$13.4M
fMRI Technologies for Imaging at the Limit of Biological Spatiotemporal Resolution: Administrative SupplementR01EB019437 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI POLIMENI, JONATHAN RIZZO, SETSOMPOP, KAWIN · 2015 to 2024
$5.5M
Resolving Human Brain Activation Across Cerebral Cortical Layers with Line-Scan Functional MRIR01NS136385 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI POLIMENI, JONATHAN R · 2024 to 2025
$1.3M
CRCNS: Computational Modeling of Microvascular Effects in Cortical Laminar fMRIR01EB032746 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI POLIMENI, JONATHAN RIZZO · 2021 to 2023
$551k
Ames Research Center NASA FT200100329NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019437NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032746NIH NIBIB: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) P41-EB03006NIH NIBIB: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R01-EB019437NIH NIBIB: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R01-EB032746NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS136385NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS136385NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS123717NINDS NIH HHS U19-NS123717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo suppress inflow effects by saturating the magnetization within slice gaps.

methodsPower independent of number of slices (PINS) pulses was designed to saturate the magnetization in all slice gaps at once. The PINS saturation module was played before every excitation. The saturation and excitation profiles were validated in simulation and phantom experiments. To demonstrate the efficacy of the method to suppress inflow, experiments were performed using a flow phantom. As an example use-case, fMRI experiments with and without PINS inflow saturation were performed at 3 T and 7 T.

resultsSimulations and phantom experiments showed that the PINS saturation module successfully saturated the magnetization in the slice gaps without degrading the slice profile of the imaging slices. Flow phantom experiments showed that the PINS saturation module suppresses through-plane inflow better than no-gap acquisitions. In vivo fMRI experiments demonstrated that the PINS saturation module can be used to modulate the spin-echo BOLD signal. At 3 T application of PINS pulses to saturate the magnetization in the slice gaps resulted in approximately 25% fewer activated voxels (PINS-ON vs. PINS-OFF). Interestingly, at 7 T the activation patterns remained more similar and only approximately 10% fewer activated voxels were detected. The observed difference between 3 and 7 T may be linked to the relative shortening of the blood T

conclusionUsing PINS pulses, inflow effects from slice gaps were effectively and efficiently saturated. The proposed PINS saturation module can be used to further study the contribution of inflow effects in fMRI data.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansPhantoms, Imagingextravascular BOLDinflow effectintravascular BOLDpower independent of number of slices (PINS) pulseSE‐BOLD

Identifiers

PMID40391598
PMCPMC12309871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.